Lake city head start: Lake City Head Start – SC Child Care Services

Lake City Head Start – SC Child Care Services

Families can now apply for child care scholarships through the new DSS benefits portal!

Learn More

Child Care Center

ABC Quality Rating

What is ABC Quality?

Facility Attributes

Operator:

Darlene Brown Graham

Capacity:

179

Facility Hours

Licensing

Licensing Type & Number:

Approval#: 393

Issue Date:

10/27/2021

Expiration Date:

10/27/2023

Call your DSS licensing specialist if you have questions:

DSS Licensing Specialist

Davis, Laura

(843) 661-6623

Facility Review & Complaint Information

(1 record found)

Inspection Reports

Note on Deficiencies

Deficiencies are listed in broad categories and are available online for 36 months. We encourage you to contact your region office for an explanation of any of the deficiencies, or for additional information about this facility’s compliance. Resolved “On Site” means that a violation was resolved during the Licensing Specialist’s inspection.

Severity Levels

High:

These are the most serious violations of child care regulations and could pose a risk to the health and safety of children. If you would like an explanation of any of the deficiencies, or would like additional information about this facility’s compliance, please contact your regional office.

Medium:

These are significant violations of child care regulations and could negatively impact the health and safety of children. If you would like an explanation of any of the deficiencies, or would like additional information about this facility’s compliance, please contact your regional office.

Low:

These violations are the least likely to impact health and safety, but they still show that a facility is out of compliance with some child care regulations. If you would like an explanation of any of the deficiencies, or would like additional information about this facility’s compliance, please contact your regional office.

Note on Frequency of Inspections

Centers, Group Homes, and Licensed Family Homes::

In 2014, legislation was passed that changed the number of unannounced visits from two per year to one per year in Child Care Centers, Group Child Care Homes, and Licensed Family Child Care Homes. As a result of this new law, you may see a decrease in the number of deficiencies listed on this website for these types of providers. Unannounced visits are still made in response to a complaint, and visits are scheduled with the facility during the re-licensing process, which occurs every two years.

Registered Family Homes:

Most family homes are registered, not licensed. In 2014, legislation was passed that allows Child Care Licensing to make one unannounced visit to these homes each year. As a result of this new law, you may see an increase in the number of deficiencies listed on this website for Registered Family Child Care Homes. Unannounced visits are still made in response to a complaint. Click here for an overview of each facility and the requirements they must meet according to state law.

Lake City Head Start | Lake City SC Child Care Center

Write a Review

About the Provider

Pinnacle Pointe Daycare Academy – Union City GA Child Care Learning Center

Description: Lake City Head Start is a Child Care Center in Lake City SC, with a maximum capacity of 179 children. The provider does not participate in a subsidized child care program.

Additional Information: ABC Quality Level: A;

Program and Licensing Details

• License Number:
  393
• Capacity:
  179
• ABC Quality Level:
  A+
• Enrolled in Subsidized Child Care Program:
  No
• Current License Issue Date:
  Oct 27, 2021
• Current License Expiration Date:
  Oct 27, 2023
• District Office:
  South Carolina Dept. of Social Services – Division of Child Care Services
• District Office Phone:
  Davis, Laura (Note: This is not the facility phone number.)
• Licensor:
  (843) 661-6623

Location Map

Inspection/Report History

Where possible, ChildcareCenter provides inspection reports as a service to families. This information is deemed reliable,
but is not guaranteed. We encourage families to contact the daycare provider directly with any questions or concerns,
as the provider may have already addressed some or all issues. Reports can also be verified with your local daycare licensing office.

If you are a provider and you believe any information is incorrect, please contact us. We will research your concern and make corrections accordingly.

Reviews

Be the first to review this childcare provider.
Write a review about Lake City Head Start. Let other families know what’s great, or what could be improved.
Please read our brief review guidelines to make your review as helpful as possible.

Email address (will not be published):

Display name:

Which best describes your experience?:

Select from belowI have used this provider for more than 6 monthsI have used this provider for less than 6 monthsI have toured this provider’s facility, but have not used its servicesI am the ownerI am an employeeOther

Rating (1=poor, 5=excellent):

Select your Rating1 star2 star3 star4 star5 star

Review Policy:

ChildcareCenter.us does not actively screen or monitor user reviews, nor do we verify or edit content. Reviews reflect
only the opinion of the writer. We ask that users follow our
review guidelines. If you see a review that does not reflect these guidelines, you can email us. We will assess
the review and decide the appropriate next step. Please note – we will not remove a review simply because it is
negative. Providers are welcome to respond to parental reviews, however we ask that they identify themselves as
the provider.

Write a Review

Providers in ZIP Code 29560

Skipper Learning Center

The Carolina Academy

Cool Kids Academy

Edu Scholars Learning Center

Lake City Head Start

Lake City Presbyterian Community Child Care

McFadden’s Learning & Child Care Academy

Parental Care Learning Center

Kountry Kids Child Development Center

5 worst matches of the Russian team at the Olympic Games – Hockey

Lillehammer 1994. Russia – Finland – 0: 4

Stages of the tournament: Match for third place

Coaches: Victor Tikhonov – Kurt Lindstrom

Main stars: Tertyshny, Kudashov, Berezin, Nikolishin, Gusmanov, Gusmanov, Gusmanov , Sorokin – Peltonen, S. Koivu, M. Nieminen, S. Kapanen, Lehtinen.

In Lillehammer, the Russian team met the Finns twice and both times were inferior in all respects. That is why the second defeat – in the match for medals – became more offensive. The team’s coaching staff, in theory, should have already prepared for the opponent, to know how to beat him – in fact, another rout came out. After the glorious medal years of the USSR national team, the debut result of the Russian team was considered shameful. Viktor Tikhonov, of course, was dismissed from his post.

However, despite the score, the match for third place was not so terrible. The Russians almost held out the first period, tried to respond with attacks on attack, but only one unsuccessful exit from their own zone in the 18th minute and the whole game went under the Finnish polka. Actions at their gates were generally the main trouble for Tikhonov’s team that evening – instead of starting an attack, the Russians had to take away the puck two or three times, which they seemed to have taken possession of a few seconds ago. With such problems in the organization of the game, such a result was natural:

VIDEO

Key moment: Finns’ second goal in the last minute of the first period. Valery Ivannikov, who was defending the gate, for whom this was his debut match at the Olympics, took the initiative and for some reason rolled out behind the puck flying off the board. That, in turn, flew past the goalkeeper’s trap, and watching the defense, until it hit Mika Alatalo. The puck flew into the goal, the Finn – into the goalkeeper, only the defenders, who did not expect such a miniature, continued to watch.

Two goals conceded at the very end of the first twenty minutes – and the chances of the Russian team turned into theoretical ones.

Words : “No great coach in the world can achieve a result with a team that was created a few weeks before the start of the “pine”. The players were collected from 11 clubs, so there was no question of any mutual understanding. We had a completely inexperienced team. Having fallen under the pressure of the strongest teams in the world, we were not able to demonstrate our playing potential. Two defeats from the Finns with a total score of 0:9and the loss of the mediocre German national team is still like a thorn in the heart » (Sergey Sorokin, defender, Gazeta. ru, 2011).

Fact: Only 9 hockey players from this team of Finland were able to break into the national team to participate in the Games-98 in Nagano.

Salt Lake City 2002. Russia – Finland – 1:3

Tournament stage: group stage

Coaches: Vyacheslav Fetisov – Hannu Aravirta

Main stars: Fedorov, P. Bure, Kovalev, Larionov, Afinogenov, Kasparaitis, Khabibulin-Selanne, O. Jokinen, S Kapanen, Lehtinen, Niinimaa.

Then it seemed that this team was created in order to avenge the silver of 1998 – Fetisov picked up a squad that was no worse than the four-year-old one. In addition, Pavel Bure was in the team, which, according to old memory, elevated it to the rank of tournament favorites. True, no one wanted to accept the fact that the health of the Russian Rocket was no longer what it used to be.

Looking ahead, we note that revenge was taken from the Czechs, as we have already talked about, but the Russians did not succeed in Olympic revenge in a more global sense. And doubts about the medal prospects and the indestructibility of this team appeared already at the group stage: not the most confident victory in the match with the Belarusians and this defeat from the Finns.

But, in fact, nothing foreshadowed the loss of points – here Bure traditionally throws the puck into the goal of the Suomi team, here Khabibulin quite easily takes the puck from the opponent. By the break, the difference in the score was only 1:0, but the unconditional advantage, including on throws – 11:2 – is on the side of the Russians. However, a hockey match lasts 60 minutes, but Fetisov’s hockey players were not ready for such innovations. The Russians rushed to save their homeland with drafts unsheathed only in the second half of the last period, but it was too late: to win back “-2” from the closed Finns is too difficult a task.

Although there was a very inspiring episode in that match, which, perhaps, even covered the negative result of the group stage game:

VIDEO

Key moment: Second period. Rather, the break before the second twenty minutes was the very moment when Aravirta assured his players that it was possible to win even against the overly stellar Russian team, and self-confidence and peace reigned in the opposite locker room. The result is 20 minutes completely lost by the Fetisov team, which predetermined the outcome of the meeting.

Words: « Maybe the motivation was not enough. After the Americans defeated the Belarusians, it became clear that it was unrealistic to take first place in the group. And in the first period we played decently and if we had scored the second goal, then everything, I think, would have turned out differently. And as is usually the case, one mistake turned everything upside down. When you play well, it is important not to relax, to put pressure on your opponent. The “killer instinct” must be triggered. By the way, we talked about this with the guys after the match with the Americans.
But for the rest of the tournament, this match, by and large, meant nothing. And we considered it as a stage of preparation for the playoffs. Of course, it would be nice to start the quarter-final in a more joyful mood. But, on the other hand, this failure is a good lesson from which to draw the right conclusions ” (Vyacheslav Fetisov , Sport-Express, 2002).

Fact: Before the second period, the Finnish coaching staff decides to put the 13th striker – Mikko Eloranta – in the second link. In the 37th minute of the match, the Finn will score the winning goal. 98, where the Russians beat their neighbor twice and where, by the way, there was not a single meeting for this material.

Vladimir Krikunov’s team approached the semi-final bloodless: Alexander Korolyuk suffered from a groin injury, and Evgeni Malkin watched what was happening in civilian clothes – his hit on Lecavalier in the quarter-finals was assessed by a match-penalty. The coaching staff had only 11 strikers left – holes in the semi-finals will be plugged by 20-year-old Ovechkin, but this will not help the team.

Yes, the Russian team gave the Finns too many opportunities to play in the majority, but the “0” in the column of abandoned goals also speaks of unused own chances. And, surprisingly, there were very few of them. Krikunov’s team did not succeed in any combinational game, and individual actions were quickly suppressed by the Finns. For many players – for example, for Kovalchuk, who brought the fourth goal – that meeting was the worst in his career right then.

Video

Key moment: removal of Ivan Nepryaev in the second period. For the semi-finals, the Russian team players broke the rules too often. The Finns, in whom a high percentage of the implementation of the majority is absorbed with mother’s milk, do not forgive such negligence. The very first removal in the match – Sergei Gonchar – was successfully implemented by the Westerlund team, but this did not teach the Russian team anything. Removal of Ivan Nepryaev for holding a stick in the second period led to the fact that the score became 0:3. And such a handicap at the Olympics is not recouped, at least not among the Finns.

Lyrics: « Actually, I don’t like to return to this topic – it bleeds too much. But since you asked, I’ll answer. I thought about it more than once and I am still convinced that before the semi-final and during it, we should have given much more time to the game system, how exactly we will act against the Finns. Who and how should play in certain situations. I still believe that if we had approached the preparations for that match in more detail, everything would have turned out differently ” (Evgeny Nabokov, Sport-Express, 2002).

• Full names: Marco Anthony Archer
• Paul: Male

9000 Ethnicity : Mixed race

• Religion : Christian
• Sexual orientation: Straight

Fora’s birthday

• Age / how old? : 25 years old
• Zodiac sign : Libra
• Date of birth : October 11, 1994
• Place of birth : Anaham, California, USA
• Birthday : October 11,

Body measurements Phora

• Body measurements : Updated soon
• Height / How tall? : 178 cm
• Mass : 60 kg
• Eye color : Green
• hair color : Brown
• Size : Updated soon
• Mother : Updated soon
• Siblings (siblings) : Updated soon
• Marital status 9Dating
• dating : Fate
• Children : Soon