Elementary school score: School Ratings & Reviews for Public & Private Schools: GreatSchools

Опубликовано: January 12, 2023 в 8:12 pm

Автор:

Категории: Miscellaneous

Elementary and Middle School Performance

LEAP 2025 Results


2021-2022











2021-2022 LEAP Percent of Students Assessed and Not Assessed Download
2022 LEAP 2025 State LEA Achievement Level Summary Download
2022 LEAP 2025 State LEA School Achievement Level Summary Download
2022 School LEAP 2025 Mastery Summary Download
2022 State LEA LEAP 2025 Mastery Subgroup Summary Download
2022 State LEA LEAP 2025 Mastery Summary Download
2022 State LEA School LEAP Grade 3-8 Achievement Level Subgroup Summary Download
2022 State LEA School LEAP High School Achievement Level Summary With Subgroups Download

2020-2021











2020-2021 LEAP Percent of Students Assessed and Not Assessed Download
2021 LEAP 2025 State LEA Achievement Level Summary Download
2021 LEAP 2025 State LEA School Achievement Level Summary Download
2021 School LEAP 2025 Mastery Summary Download
2021 State LEA LEAP 2025 Mastery Subgroup Summary Download
2021 State LEA LEAP 2025 Mastery Summary Download
2021 State LEA School LEAP Grade-3-8 Achievement Level Subgroup Summary Download
2021 State LEA School LEAP High School Achievement Level Summary With Subgroups Download

Kindergarten Entry Assessment Reports









2021-2022 DRDP Kindergarten Assessment Results_LA_LEA Download
Fall 2020 DRDP-K KEA Overview Download
2020-2021 DRDP Kindergarten Assessment Results_LA_LEA Download
2019-2020 DRDP Kindergarten Assessment Results_LA_LEA Download
2018-2019 DRDP Kindergarten Assessment Results_LA_LEA Download
2017-2018 DRDP Kindergarten Assessment Results_LA_LEA Download

2018-2019

















2018-2019 LEAP Percent of Students Assessed and Not Assessed Download
2019 LEAP 2025 Media Briefing Download
2019 School LEAP 2025 Achievement Level Summary Download
2019 School LEAP 2025 Mastery Summary Download
2019 School LEAP 2025 Progress Summary Download
2019 State LEA LEAP 2025 Achievement Level Summary Download
2019 State LEA LEAP 2025 Mastery Subgroup Summary Download
2019 State LEA LEAP 2025 Mastery Summary Download
2019 State LEA LEAP 2025 Progress Subgroup Summary Download
2019 State LEA LEAP 2025 Progress Summary Download
2019 State LEA School High School EOC Achievement Level Summary with Subgroups Download
2019 State LEA School LEAP Grade 3-8 Achievement Level Subgroup Summary Download
2019 Student Progress Media Briefing Download
2019 Top Growth Schools and School Systems Download

Fall Reading Reports













Fall 2022 Reading Report Download
Fall 2021 Reading Report Download
Fall 2020 Reading Report Download
Fall 2019 Reading Report Download
Fall 2018 Reading Report Download
Fall 2017 Reading Report Download
Fall 2016 Reading Report Download
Fall 2015 Reading Report Download
Fall 2014 Reading Report Download
Fall 2013 Reading Report Download

2017-2018















2017-18 LEAP 2025 Percent of Students Assessed and Not Assessed Download
2018 LEAP 2025 Progress School Summary Download
2018 LEAP 2025 Progress State-LEA Summary Download
2018 LEAP 2025 Progress State-LEA-School Subgroup Summary Download
2018 LEAP 2025 Student Progress Media Briefing Download
2018 State-District High School LEAP 2025 Results – Subgroup Download
Spring 2018 LEAP 2025 State LEA Achievement Level Summary Download
Spring 2018 LEAP 2025 State LEA Mastery Subgroup Summary Download
Spring 2018 LEAP 2025 State LEA Mastery Summary Download
Spring 2018 LEAP 2025 State LEA School Achievement Level Summary Download
Spring 2018 LEAP 2025 State LEA School Mastery Summary Download
Spring 2018 State LEA School LEAP Achievement Level Subgroup_public Download

ESSA









2018 9th grade credit accumulation by subgroup Download
ESSA Progress toward Longterm Goals Download
NAEP Mathematics Grade 4 Download
NAEP Mathematics Grade 8 Download
NAEP Reading Grade 4 Download
NAEP Reading Grade 8 Download





2019 State LEA School ELPT Proficiency Level Summary Download
2020 ELPT State/District/School Level Summary Download
2021 ELPT State LEA School Level Summary Download
2022 ELPT State LEA School Level Summary Download

2016-2017



LEAP Connect

 









2016-17 LEAP Percent of Students Assessed and Not Assessed Download
Spring 2017 State LEA School LEAP Achievement Level Subgroup_public Download
Spring 2017 State-LEA LEAP Achievement Level Summary Download
Spring 2017 State-LEA LEAP Mastery+ Subgroup Summary Download
Spring 2017 State-LEA LEAP Mastery+ Summary Download
Spring 2017 State-LEA-School LEAP Achievement Level Summary Download
Spring 2017 State-LEA-School LEAP Mastery+ Summary Download





2019 State LEA School LEAP Connect LAA1 Achievement Level Summary Download
2020 LEAP Connect State District School by Grade by Subject Download
2021 LEAP Connect State District School by Grade and Subject Download
2022 LEAP Connect State District School by Grade and Subject Download

2015-2016



Interests and Opportunities








Spring 2016 Assessment Results Presentation Download
Spring 2016 State-LEA LEAP Summary Download
Spring 2016 State-LEA-School LEAP Summary Download
Spring 2016 State-LEA LEAP Percentile Rankings Download
Spring 2016 State LEA LEAP Achievement Level Subgroup_public Download



2021 Interests and Opportunities Results Download
2019 Interests and Opportunities Results Download

2014-2015



LEAP/ILEAP HISTORICAL DATA









Spring 2015 Assessment Results Presentation Download
Spring 2015 State-LEA LEAP Summary Download
Spring 2015 State-LEA-School LEAP Summary Download
Spring 2015 State-LEA LEAP Percentile Rankings Download
2015 State LAA1 Subgroup Report Download
Spring 2015 State LEA LEAP Achievement Level Subgroup_public Download








2012-2013 State LEAP-iLEAP Summary Download
2011-2012 State LEAP-iLEAP Summary Download
2010-2011 State LEAP-iLEAP Summary Download
2009-2010 State LEAP-iLEAP Summary Download
2008-2009 State LEAP-iLEAP Summary Download
2007-2008 State LEAP-iLEAP Summary Download
1999-2007 State LEAP-iLEAP Summary Download

2013-2014






Spring 2014 State-LEA LEAP Summary Download
Spring 2014 State-LEA-School LEAP Summary Download
Spring 2014 State-LEA LEAP Promotional Reports Download

Arboretum Elementary School (2022-23 Ranking)

Top Rankings
Overview
School Rankings
Frequently Asked Questions
Nearby Public Schools
School Reviews
Edit School Profile

Top Rankings

Arboretum Elementary School ranks among the top 20% of public schools in Wisconsin for:

Category

Attribute

Overall Rank

Highest overall rank (Top 1%)

Math Proficiency

Highest math proficiency (Top 1%)

Reading/Language Arts Proficiency

Highest reading/language arts proficiency (Top 5%)

School Overview

Arboretum Elementary School’s student population of 430 students has declined by 6% over five school years.

The teacher population of 33 teachers has stayed relatively flat over five school years.

School Rankings

Arboretum Elementary School is ranked within the top 1% of all 2,025 schools in Wisconsin (based off of combined math and reading proficiency testing data) for the 2018-19 school year.

The diversity score of Arboretum Elementary School is 0.27, which is less than the diversity score at state average of 0.51. The school’s diversity has stayed relatively flat over five school years.

Source: 2020-2021 (latest school year available) National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), WI Dept. of Education

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Arboretum Elementary School’s ranking?

Arboretum Elementary School ranks among the top 20% of public schools in Wisconsin for: Highest overall rank (Top 1%), Highest math proficiency (Top 1%) and Highest reading/language arts proficiency (Top 5%).

What percent of students have achieved state testing proficiency in math and reading?

90-94% of students have achieved math proficiency (compared to the 43% WI state average), while 70-74% of students have achieved reading proficiency (compared to the 41% WI state average).

How many students attend Arboretum Elementary School?

430 students attend Arboretum Elementary School.

What is the racial composition of the student body?

85% of Arboretum Elementary School students are White, 6% of students are Two or more races, 4% of students are Asian, 4% of students are Hispanic, and 1% of students are Black.

What is the student:teacher ratio of Arboretum Elementary School?

Arboretum Elementary School has a student ration of 13:1, which is equal to the Wisconsin state average of 13:1.

What grades does Arboretum Elementary School offer ?

Arboretum Elementary School offers enrollment in grades Prekindergarten-4 (offers virtual instruction).

What school district is Arboretum Elementary School part of?

Arboretum Elementary School is part of Waunakee Community School District.

School Reviews

Review Arboretum Elementary School. Reviews should be a few sentences in length. Please include any comments on:

  • Quality of academic programs, teachers, and facilities
  • Availability of music, art, sports and other extracurricular activities

New York City Schools: Science Genius Launches Hip Hop Cypher

We take a look at a new craze sweeping science classrooms across the country, highlighted by a recent “rap-off” in New York City Schools.

More Technology Finding a Place in Public Education

Learn about school districts that are finding funds to supply students and faculty with laptops, iPads and other technology tools to enhance the educational experience.

Powered by Propane: Greener School Buses

Diesel school buses are quickly becoming the dunces of the schoolyard, with many public schools switching to greener and more cost-effective propane school buses.

0:39

Ashley’s Visit to Arboretum Elementary School

View more school videos

What are the Benefits of Public School Over Homeschooling?

Smaller Class Sizes: Pros and Cons

Top Ranked Public Schools in the US

The Pros and Cons of Mandatory Gym Class in Public Schools

How Does Bullying Affect a Student’s Academic Performance?

More Articles

Opinion
Teaching
About Public Schools
Evaluating Public Schools
Public School Jobs

Will grades remain in elementary school

The reason for the discussion was the statement of the Minister of Education Olga Vasilyeva, when at the All-Russian Parents’ Meeting she was offered to cancel grades in elementary school.

– We don’t have marks in the first class. And kids should not have them – they need a strong positive motivation to study. In the first grade, marks will definitely not lead to anything good. However, they are needed for secondary and high schools: this is a tool that reflects the level of knowledge of students,” the minister stressed. nine0003

And suggested that the issue be raised for public comment. Interestingly? The children themselves, as shown by a survey of the Russian Academy of Education among students in grades 2-4, are not even against the assessments: “for” – 82% of the guys. They would not like to receive them, especially if they are deuces, only 15%. And only 3% could not give a specific answer. The survey involved 2,500 students from Moscow and the Moscow region, Volgograd, Rostov-on-Don, Irkutsk and Lipetsk regions.

According to Natalya Vinogradova, head of the Center for Primary General Education at the Institute for Education Development Strategy of the Russian Academy of Education, there should be no marks in the first grade – this is enshrined in law. But in fact, the teachers put them on anyway: for some children – a beautiful flower, for others – a green frog. As a result – tears, resentment, conflicts with parents…

– All kids come to school with high self-esteem, and we “successfully” reduce it. This should not be. Any graphic image – stars, seals, stickers – the child perceives as the same mark, – says Natalia Vinogradova. – It comes to the point of absurdity: in one Moscow school, for academic success, children are offered to paint over bricks on a painted house. The first-grader boasts: “Praise me, I’m an excellent student – I have eight bricks today. And Vasya is a loser, he has only one brick.” nine0003

What is the alternative? Professor Vinogradova is convinced that grades in the first grade can only be oral and only positive. In the second grade, everything is individual: the teacher must see the level of the child and understand whether the child is ready to begin acquaintance with the “mark price”. This is fundamentally important, since many children perceive the assessment not as the result of their work, but as the personal attitude of the teacher: “The teacher will never give me a “four”, she does not love me.

– We conducted a survey in middle and high school. The children were asked what, in their opinion, the teacher gives grades. Answers: “five” – ​​no mistakes, “two” – many mistakes, and “three-four” – depends on the mood of the teacher, – says Natalya Vinogradova. nine0003

Many experts advocate gradeless education from first to fourth grade.

– We conducted an experiment on the abolition of grades on the basis of the primary classes of several schools and lyceums, – says Larisa Mednikova, specialist of the Kostroma Regional Institute for the Development of Education. – The result is unequivocal – without “fives” and “twos” children develop more successfully: kids are more motivated, they are not afraid to make and correct their mistakes, they strive for self-development. For the Kostroma region, this experiment was very successful. nine0003

However, there are also opposite opinions: if grades are not introduced in elementary school, then grades 5-6 will be a complete failure. Psychologists call this age the age of “rollback”: when the child cannot fully “pull” the increasing school load. If you enter marks at this stage, then stressful situations in the class will increase significantly.

Skews should not be allowed – this idea is heard by many. If for a mother the “four” is a tragedy, then the child will perceive it the same way. Therefore, we all need to work together: teachers, psychologists, parents. nine0003

Meanwhile, proposals to abolish traditional assessments are heard more and more often. Why? Teachers do not put “ones” in principle, “twos” – especially quarterly and annual ones – many also try to avoid. And all the room for maneuver – “three”, “four”, “five”. At the same time, in the 9th and 11th grades, the main indicator is the scores on the state exams. The final essay is also evaluated not on a five-point scale, but on the “pass” or “fail” system.

A first-grader boasts: “I’m an excellent student – today I have eight bricks. And Vasya is a loser, he has only one”

– There will be a mark or not, there will be a 12-point system or a 100-point system, in principle this does not change anything. Any variant of ungraded education, no matter how good it is, will run into the general criteria for evaluating the education system, ratings, the Unified State Examination, and so on, – says the director of the Institute of Age Physiology of the Russian Academy of Education, Professor Maryana Bezrukikh.

So, will the whole “starter” refuse marks? Or will everything stay as it is? Will teachers be banned from using “asterisks” instead of “fives” and “frogs” instead of “twos”? This decision will be taken by the Ministry of Education, having received the recommendations of all experts: the discussion continues…

The role of assessment in the learning activities of elementary school students

Nikulochkina Victoria Yaroslavovna
University of the Russian Academy of Education
master’s degree

Annotation
The article examines the role of assessment obtained as a result of pedagogical control and its impact on the learning activities of younger students.

Abstract
Abstract
nine0043

References to the article:
Nikulochkina V.Ya. The role of assessment in the educational activities of elementary school students // Psychology, sociology and pedagogy. 2013. No. 12 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://psychology.snauka.ru/2013/12/2682 (date of access: 12/05/2022).

One of the most important problems of modern pedagogy and teaching methods is the control of students and the assessment of their knowledge. For the full functioning of the entire system of pedagogical training and to ensure high-quality education, it is impossible to do without checking or self-testing the acquired knowledge, acquired skills and abilities. nine0003

That is why the control of students’ knowledge has always been, is and will be one of the most important components of the educational process.
In the process of improving various techniques and methods in modern pedagogy, certain forms and methods of knowledge control change, but its main essence – establishing feedback and informing the teacher how successfully the process of assimilation of the studied material went, remains unchanged.

Pedagogical control in modern pedagogical science performs various functions and has a great educational value
and educational value. First of all, control helps students to formalize their knowledge, reproduce them orally or in writing.

The system for monitoring and grading students is currently imperfect and has a number of shortcomings: insufficient consideration of the age and individual characteristics of each student individually, standardization and formalization of assessment approaches, the dominance of quantitative forms of assessment, the dominance of not regular, but episodic assessment, high subjectivity in grading, psychological
students’ discomfort during control, a limited range of assessments, division of assessments into positive and negative, lack of a mechanism for objective summation of assessments, Optimization of control and assessment of the results of students’ learning activities directly depends on the teacher’s understanding
of the relationship between rote memorization and meaningful assimilation in the learning process. The basis of a conscious attitude to learning as to systematic and regular work is laid precisely in the lower grades. That is why, especially in elementary school, the sensitivity and ethics of the teacher in relation to the student are so important. With the use of scoring, certain conditions for cooperation between the teacher and the child are lost. When a teacher gives a bad grade to a student, a situation of pseudo help to the student is created, which, objectively, denies all aspects of cooperation: it does not encourage, inspire or console the student. nine0003

In elementary school, children create the basic structure of all subsequent educational activities, not only basic knowledge and skills, but also the skills of educational activities, as well as an orientation towards cognitive interest and positive motivation. That is why control and evaluation activities are needed not only for the management and self-management of students’ educational work, but also for the formation of a stable positive learning motivation in them, on which the success of all educational activities depends
primary school student.

The whole process of grading in a modern elementary school is complex and responsible, since it directly affects the formation of the personality of a younger student and the experience of his educational activities.

The teacher must not only give an objectively weighted sum of points, but also accurately see and predict the impact of this mark on the student. Not only the assessment itself has weight, but also how it is presented. A competent teacher will solemnly highlight and mark
in front of the class, even small and insignificant achievements in the work of the student, and he will mention the shortcomings in passing, focusing on how this can be corrected.

The entire learning process and the efforts of the teacher are primarily aimed at the comprehensive and harmonious development of students.
Educational assessment, as a result of control, is equivalent to
social assessment, has a strong influence on the student, on his worldview in society, the attitude of the team towards him. Therefore, when evaluating work, the teacher should be guided not only by the norms and regulations for grading, but also understand how the assessment will affect a particular student, his
motivation and attitude towards further learning.

When motivating and justifying an assessment, an experienced teacher uses a critical, persuasive tone. The voice of the teacher is the most important tool with limitless stimulating possibilities.

The most important thing for the student is the assessment of his work in the class in the presence of others, which is accompanied by a commentary by the teacher. One of the important principles of effective and motivating control is its organization in such a way that it does not mentally traumatize children. Special
challenges for individual performance of tasks for the purpose of control during extracurricular time create emotional discomfort, negatively affect the quality of educational activities of younger students.

It should also be noted that there are deep psychological connections between the assessment received and the student’s internal self-assessment. The student evaluates in his soul the degree of completeness of his work, and unfortunate blunders, and offensively unused opportunities, he also evaluates the level of teaching skill. It is important for a teacher to be able to feel
the reaction of students, it must not only be perceived, but also reckoned with.

Any assessment should be based on a child-friendly attitude. The teacher is obliged to briefly, but clearly enough for the student, to analyze the difficulties that he has not yet overcome, to explain what this leads to, to aim at a positive result. The teacher must remember that an unsatisfactory grade
negatively affects learning, creates anxiety in the student, dissatisfaction with himself and negatively affects interest in the subject being studied. Psychological research shows that negative
Emotions generated by evaluation mobilize forces in one case and disorganize them in another. Therefore, the teacher, in order to assess students’ knowledge objectively, must know their individual characteristics well.

Objectivity – is one of the most important requirements
for assessing the knowledge and skills of students and is expressed in an accurate assessment, adequate setting of criteria, according to the
curriculum. This requirement means that the assessment should characterize the quantity and quality of knowledge and skills, regardless of the methods and means of control, the personal qualities of the teacher who exercises control. Evaluation is the emotional attitude of the teacher to the work of students and can be expressed in a word,
gesture, facial expressions and mean consent, approval, praise, dissatisfaction.

A positive assessment is a means of strengthening the student’s faith in his strengths and abilities. A negative assessment is a means of eliminating errors in the student’s work. An evaluative attitude can be of great importance for the formation of a student’s self-esteem as a certain element of self-consciousness. Annoyance, student dissatisfaction with grades can lead to an unconscious conflict with the environment, a decrease in self-esteem, disappointment in one’s own abilities, and deactivation of cognitive interest in studying the subject. nine0003

Evaluation in the process of teaching younger students is one of the important means of motivating and stimulating their educational and cognitive activity. The development of education in modern conditions poses many new tasks, and the development of psychological and pedagogical approaches to the control and evaluation of knowledge and the determination of ways and methods for their implementation in the process of studying mathematics are of exceptional importance.

An important psychological and pedagogical principle in the process of monitoring and evaluating knowledge is objectivity, because the effectiveness of all control depends on it. Control drives organization
full-fledged interaction between a teacher and a student, makes it possible to objectively evaluate the progress of educational activities and compare
the result with the set goals and objectives, Properly organized control and objectivity
assessment allows students to evaluate their work, evoke a sense of satisfaction with their achievements and increases cognitive interest and activation of aspirations to learning and acquiring new knowledge.