Three year old program: Preschool Programs for Ages 3

3-Year-Old Program | Early Childhood Center (ECC)

​3-Year-Old Program

Early Childhood Center uses Creative Curriculum® to reflect our play-based philosophy and guide the teachers’ lesson planning as children develop through the years. We respect each child’s developmental progress and encourage growth in eight different areas including social and emotional development, problem-solving skills, literacy, math and science. Each age group provides unique opportunities for growth.

​

Within the broader framework of our curriculum for the whole child, some specific goals for our three-years-old program include:

• Develop independence and build self-expression skills

• Strengthen social interactions with peers and adults

• Explore the concepts behind early literacy, math, and problem solving techniques

• Reinforce fine and gross motors skills

​

Independence and Self-Expression

As three-year-olds become more confident, their independence and self-expression grows. Class plans reflect the children’s eagerness to complete tasks independently and express themselves through language skills, the arts, and social interactions. Time is built into the daily schedule for children to learn self-help skills (putting on outdoor clothes, washing hands, cleaning up art messes, self-serving snack and lunch), classroom clean-up and community chores. Teachers work with the children to help them learn to express their thoughts about the world they explore. Opportunities abound for verbal and written language development and expressive art.

Strengthen Social Interactions

Teachers use several strategies to strengthen social skills in the classroom including modeling behavior and social stories. Social interactions really begin to develop in a new direction for three-year-olds. Friendships begin to develop and the children learn to express their needs and to listen to the ideas of their peers. Learning to share, take turns, negotiate and compromise and to express feelings in a positive manner are all part of this stage of their emotional development. We encourage children find words to express their emotions and appropriately express them when playing with others. Teachers take these opportunities to carefully observe and guide interactions.

Explore Early Literacy, Math and Problem Solving

Our curriculum supports engaging lessoning plans for teaching children the meaning behind words, letters, shapes and numbers. Teachers design a carefully balanced class schedule that combines appropriate time for teacher and child-initated activities. These activities encourage children to problem-solve and explore math concepts and the written word. Labeled materials with authentic writing, carefully placed manipulative materials, and reserved space for writing centers, science investigation and reading throughout the classrooms reinforce teacher directed activities.

Reinforce Gross and Fine Motors Skills

Class schedules build in lots of time for improving children’s gross and fine motor skills. ECC’s playground, located in a beautiful park-like setting, provides ample outdoor space for climbing structures, playing with balls, running, skipping, and riding bikes and scooters. During indoor time, children have creative movement time and plenty of center activities for strengthening fine motor skills, including specially designed art projects, sensory table investigation and table-top manipulative games.

Three-Year-Old Journey | Harlem Children’s Zone

The Three-Year-Old Journey provides Promise Academy® lottery winners the opportunity to continue to learn, grow, and nurture friendships.

For Parents and Children age 3

Email Us

Call 917-574-6029

About Three-Year-Old Journey

As children develop and change, parents and guardians must change as well. The Three-Year-Old Journey formed in 2004 to provide Promise Academy® lottery winners the opportunity to continue to learn and grow.

• Participants of the Three-Year-Old Journey engage in a series of workshops over twelve weeks.
• They discuss developmental milestones, discipline techniques, and developmentally-appropriate activities to foster early literacy and math skills.
• Parents also gain a sense of community and camaraderie — and many remain friends and lean on each other for parenting support and schedule play dates for their children.
• As the parents and guardians interact, their three-year-olds play together in small and large groups under the guidance of trained staff.
• In addition to having fun — singing, doing arts and crafts, listening to stories, and more — they are also learning and practicing invaluable social skills.

Toddlers learn about healthy fruits and vegetables.

A father and son do arts and crafts in class.

Program Structure

Two twelve-week cycles are open to 60 families each. Participants meet on Saturdays at Promise Academy® I. Workshops are offered in English, Spanish, and French.

Program Benefits

In addition to both parents and children gaining knowledge and building relationships, families of the Three-Year-Old Journey gain access to:

• Guidance in applying to the Harlem Gems® preschool program
• Brigance Early Childhood Developmental Screening and Assessment Tool, which provides a snapshot of a child’s development and assesses school readiness
• Referrals to HCZ programs and community resources

Harlem Gems® Preschool

For interested parents, we offer assistance through HCZ’s Harlem Gems® Preschool application process.

Brigance Developmental Screening

We use the Brigance screener twice per cycle to identify children’s areas of strength and needs.

HCZ and Community Resources

We help families take advantage of HCZ’s numerous programs and community resources to meet their needs—from financial support to health and wellness, and more.

Location

The Three-Year-Old Journey meets on Saturdays at Promise Academy® I.

Contact

We’re here to help. Please email or call us if you have questions or want to learn more.

statute of limitations, who is obliged to pay, whether it passes from the previous owner

Please tell me how legally the overhaul fund operates. The situation is this.

My husband inherited an apartment this year, after which he found out that for some reason the receipts for the overhaul were not coming, although the house itself was included in the overhaul program.

I wrote a request to the fund, and it turned out that they did not have data about the apartment, and they did not generate receipts. As a result of the appeal, we were sent a response, according to which accruals were made from November 1, 2014, that is, for 6 years!

Is this legal? After all, firstly, the apartment became the property only this year as an inheritance. Secondly, this is the mistake of the fund itself, that they did not generate receipts. Why do we have to pay a huge amount for overhaul for this?

If this is not legal, what would you advise us to do? Go to court? And what arguments can you rely on to prove your case?

Thank you in advance for your reply.

Anastasia Kornilova

lawyer

Author profile

Ekaterina, unfortunately, part of the debt will definitely have to be paid. Contributions for major repairs are tied to the apartment, and not to the owner, unlike other utilities. And if the previous owner did not pay for the overhaul, then this debt passed to your husband along with the inherited apartment.

But do not rush to pay the entire amount of the debt. If the Capital Improvement Fund files a lawsuit, you can ask the court to apply the three-year statute of limitations. Then you can pay less. Let me explain how best to proceed in your situation.

When the obligation to pay for overhaul arises

Owners of premises in an apartment building are required to pay monthly contributions for the overhaul of common property. But there are exceptions when you do not need to pay. For example, a house has been declared unsafe, or the state or municipality plans to withdraw a land plot for their needs.

Art. 169 ZhK RF

The owner is not required to pay contributions until his house is included in the regional overhaul program. But as soon as the house is included in the program, the news about it is officially published on the official website of the regional administration. The owners have time to get acquainted with it.

Different regions set their own deadlines: some give four months for familiarization, others seven. But less than three months and more than eight is impossible. After that, you have to pay for the overhaul. In the Sverdlovsk Region, where you live, such an obligation arises six months after the date of the official publication of the information.

Art. 12-1 of the law of the Sverdlovsk region dated December 19, 2013 No. 127-OZ

The owner must find out about the publication himself. Here, an analogue of the rule “ignorance of the law does not exempt from responsibility” applies. Even if the repair fund doesn’t send you receipts, you need to periodically ask if your house is in the program so as not to miss the moment when you need to make payments.

Judicial practice in this case is not on the side of homeowners. The courts say that the obligation to pay arises for tenants by virtue of law and has nothing to do with whether the overhaul fund sends receipts or not.

What to do? 04/08/19

A debt for overhaul came from the previous owners

Why now the debt will have to be paid to your family

By law, the debt for overhaul is tied to an apartment, not to the owner. As soon as your husband entered into the inheritance, along with the ownership of the apartment, he received the debts that were on it. Now he, as the owner of the premises in the MKD, is obliged to maintain it, including paying for the overhaul.

item 5 part 2 art. 153, part 1 of Art. 158 ZhK RF

The fact that neither he nor the previous owner received receipts does not matter. The owner is still obliged to pay the cost of overhaul.

If receipts are not received, contact the regional operator and find out the reason. So you did absolutely the right thing when you began to find out what was happening with receipts and payments.

p. 3 art. 158 ZhK RF

How to reduce the amount of debt

You do not need to pay for all six years. The law has the concept of limitation period – this is the period for protection at the suit of a person whose right has been violated. As a general rule, the statute of limitations is three years.

Art. 195, part 1, art. 196 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation

The Ministry of Construction considers that the three-year period also applies to obligations to pay contributions for major repairs. Courts also adhere to this rule.

For example, in the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug, a woman did not pay for major repairs for several years, because no receipts were sent to her. The Capital Repair Fund filed a lawsuit and demanded to recover from it the debt from September 1, 2014 to February 29, 2020, that is, almost five years. According to the fund, the woman herself had to apply for receipts if she did not receive them.

The debtor asked the court to dismiss the fund’s claims: since she did not receive receipts, she could not pay. However, the court said that the obligation of the owner of the dwelling to pay contributions for overhaul arises by virtue of the law. This means that if the fund did not send payment documents and requests for payment of debts to the owner, including for a long time, this is not a reason not to pay for overhaul at all.

However, the fund failed to recover the entire amount. The woman filed an application for the application of the limitation period, and the court granted it. He partially reduced the claims: he almost halved the amount of debt, and tripled the amount of penalties.

You can also apply the statute of limitations. But there is one caveat: this can only be done during the trial. That is, the overhaul fund must apply to the court to recover the debt from your spouse. As long as there is no litigation, the statute of limitations cannot be applied.

What to do? 04/26/19

Is there a statute of limitations for utility bills?

Everything about how to live in Russia

And interact with management companies and neighbors – in our mailing list. Subscribe to not miss important articles

What can be done

Try negotiating with the capital repair fund. Write a letter there, saying that you are ready to pay the debt from the moment your husband became the heir, as well as part of the debt of the previous owner.

For example, if you write in December 2020, count back three years. It turns out that you must pay the debt of the testator from December 2017 until the moment of his death.

If the Capital Repair Fund refuses to enter into such an agreement with you, you have two options. Each has its pros and cons.

Pay only from the moment the husband becomes the owner. You pay only your part, starting from the moment of death of the testator. In the future, you continue to make all regular payments on time. And when the overhaul fund goes to court to recover the debt of the testator from you, ask to apply the limitation period. Then you will have to pay only that part of the debt for which it has not yet expired at the time of filing an application with the court.

/prava/kommunalochka/

Rights of the consumer of housing and communal services

On the one hand, the later the trial starts, the shorter the term of the debt. It will gradually remain in the past, and the debt will decrease.

On the other hand, for the unpaid amount, the overhaul fund will calculate penalties in the amount of 1/300 of the key rate of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation for each day of delay. The countdown is from 31 days of violation of the payment deadline to the day of the actual transfer of money.

Part 14.1 Art. 155 ZhK RF

Pay part of the previous owner’s debt. You pay your amount starting from the moment of the death of the testator, and continue to make all the next payments on time. You also pay off part of the testator’s debt for the previous three years. For example, if you pay in January 2021, then you need to pay the amount from January 2018 to the month of the death of the testator.

Specify exactly this period in the receipt or do not indicate any. The main thing is not to write earlier dates. In this case, the overhaul fund will not be able to calculate the fee for the period for which the limitation period has expired.

clause 32 of Resolution of the Plenum of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation dated June 27, 2017 No. 22

If the overhaul fund goes to court to recover the remaining debt of the testator from you, ask to apply the limitation period.

This option is also ambiguous. On the one hand, the amount of penalties that the capital repair fund may require will be less, since you will voluntarily pay off the debt earlier.

But if you want to save money, then this option will not work. Let’s say you pay your part for the previous three years as well. And if the overhaul fund delayed filing a lawsuit for six months, then you would have to pay for only 2.5 years: for the rest of the period, the limitation period will already expire. It is possible that the fund will delay the claim even more, and will have to pay less. But it’s hard to predict.

In any case, I advise you to definitely pay off the debt for the period when your husband became the heir. And continue to pay for the following months, preferably in compliance with the deadlines, so that the fund does not calculate penalties.

Difficult question 06/30/17

How to pay utility bills correctly

If you are interested in learning more about how to pay utility bills, we have a selection of articles on this topic.

What to do? Readers ask, experts answer

Ask your question

Limitation period for the division of property of spouses – Lawyer in Samara and Moscow

Limitation period in accordance with Art. 195 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation recognizes the period for protecting the right on the claim of a person whose right has been violated.

Accordingly, the limitation period for disputes on the division of the jointly acquired property of the spouses is the period during which the division of the common property can be made.

Sometimes it is called the term for the division of property, the statute of limitations for the division of property, and other similar terms. But the correct name is the limitation period for claims for the division of the common property of the spouses (clause 7, article 38 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation).

According to paragraph 7 of Art. 38 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation, a three-year statute of limitations applies to the claims of spouses on the division of the common property of spouses whose marriage is dissolved. In terms of terms, this norm is consistent with Art. 196 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, which establishes a general limitation period of three years.

From paragraph 7 of Art. 38 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation it follows that the period for the division of property begins to run no earlier than the dissolution of the marriage between the spouses. If the marriage is not dissolved, then the limitation period does not begin to run. It does not matter whether the spouses live together or separately.

At the first reading of paragraph 7 of Art. 38 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation, it can be concluded that the limitation period for claims for the division of the common property of the spouses begins to run from the date of divorce. However, this is not true.

Paragraph 19 of the Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated 05.11.1998 No. 15 “On the application of legislation by the courts when considering cases of divorce” clarifies that the three-year limitation period for claims for the division of property that is the common joint property of spouses whose marriage is dissolved (clause 7, article 38 of the RF IC), should not be calculated from the time of termination of marriage (the day of state registration of divorce in the civil status register when a marriage is dissolved in a civil registry office, and when a marriage is dissolved in a court – the day of entry into the legal force of the decision), but from the day when the person found out or should have found out about the violation of his right (clause 1, article 200 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation).

Judicial practice entirely and fully supporting the clarification of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation.

For example, the Review of Legislation and Judicial Practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation for the First Quarter of 2006 indicates that the running of the limitation period in accordance with the general rules enshrined in paragraph 1 of Art. 200 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, begins from the day when the spouse who applied for judicial protection found out or should have found out about the violation of his right.

In particular, if, after the dissolution of the marriage, the former spouses continue to jointly use the common property, then the limitation period begins to run from the day when one of them takes an action that prevents the other spouse from exercising his rights in relation to this property (for example, alienation property).

As can be seen from the case file, the marriage between the spouses was annulled in 1998, and the applicant learned about the violation of his rights only in 2003.

Further, in the Bulletin of Judicial Practice on Civil Cases of the Sverdlovsk Regional Court for the first quarter of 2008, approved by the decision of the Presidium of the Sverdlovsk Regional Court dated April 16, 2008, the following is indicated.

By itself, the moment of termination of marriage has no legal significance when considering claims for the division of property. In order to establish circumstances that are legally significant in the case, the court should find out whether the right of the spouse to own and use the disputed property was violated after the dissolution of the marriage, when the plaintiff knew or should have known about the violation of his right, and, depending on this, establish whether the plaintiff missed the deadline for the claim prescription…

The plaintiff also stated that the defendant did not take any action preventing him from exercising his rights in relation to the disputed property until the beginning of 2007. In 2007 he decided to move into the apartment, but the defendant did not hand over the keys to him.

For example, I will cite the practice of the Moscow City Court. For example, in the Ruling of the Moscow City Court dated March 21, 2013 N 4g / 7-1844 / 13, the court indicates the following.

Disagreeing with A.P.V. about the pass A.O.A. limitation period, the court reasonably concluded that the limitation period for the above requirements was not missed by her, since her violated right O.A. found out only when applying to the court A.P.V. with a demand to terminate her right to use the apartment, while the court took into account paragraph 19Decree of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation N 15 of November 5, 1998 “On the application of legislation by the courts when considering cases of divorce”, according to which the three-year limitation period for claims for the division of property that is the common joint property of spouses whose marriage is dissolved should be calculated from the day when the person knew or should have known about the violation of his right, and not from the moment of dissolution of the marriage.

Given that after the dissolution of the marriage, A.O.A. used the disputed apartment, she learned about the violation of her rights only after A.P.V. to the court, the conclusion of the court to the effect that A.Oh.A. not missed the statute of limitations, is legitimate.

In each individual case, it is necessary to investigate the question of when the plaintiff on the claim for the division of common property learned or should have learned about the violation of his right. Depending on the specific circumstances of the case, the deadline may be missed. And missing the deadline for applying to the court is sufficient grounds for dismissing the claim, even if the requirements are justified.

According to paragraph 2 of Art. 199 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the expiration of the limitation period, the application of which is declared by the party to the dispute, is the basis for the court to decide to dismiss the claim. But the limitation period is applied by the court only at the request of the party to the dispute, made before the court makes a decision.