Daycare poplar bluff mo: THE Top 10 Daycares in Poplar Bluff, MO

Опубликовано: February 20, 2023 в 8:42 pm

Автор:

Категории: Miscellaneous

THE Top 10 Daycares in Poplar Bluff, MO

Daycares in Poplar Bluff, MO

Description:

Envoyé life and exploré! Camp live Bring your own RV.

Description:

Kathryn A. Hall Day Care is a state-licensed facility that offers child care services designed for infants to school-age children. Located at 2003 Tennessee Street, the company serves families residing in thePoplar Bluff, MO area. Kathryn A. Hall Day Care is open to children who are zero to 12 years old….

Miss Jennys Daycare

6105 Pinecrest Dr, Poplar Bluff, MO 63901

Costimate: $100/day

Description:

Miss Jenny’s Daycare is a childcare provider that serves the community of Poplar Bluff Missouri since 2010. It offers a nurturing environment and age-appropriate activities for children. The center promotesholistic development by providing children with programs that enhance their physical, mental and social skills….

Little Hearts Daycare

2405 Township Line Rd, Poplar Bluff, MO 63901

Costimate: $100/day

Description:

Little Hearts Daycare is a child care center that offers early care and education services for infants to school-age kids. The company is located at 2405 Township Line Road, and they serve the residents ofPoplar Bluff, MO. Little Hearts Daycare has a capacity of 20 children, and they accept kids between the ages of 12 months and 12 years old….

Tiny Tots Daycare

2850 Fair St, Poplar Bluff, MO 63901

Costimate: $100/day

Description:

Tiny Tots Daycare believes in children developing best in a loving and nurturing environment where active learning is encouraged. The program is play-based, developmental, and designed to create the foundationfor a lifetime of successful learning and relationships….

Description:

Christian Community Care Center Inc. is a Christian-based preschool, designed to provide an environment for the child to grow and develop into what God has intended. Their goal is to nurture children’senthusiasm about learning and assist them in reaching their full potential; ultimately leading to successful entry into kindergarten. …

Description:

TRCC Early Childhood Learning Center located in Poplar Bluff, MO is a childcare facility specializing in children ages two to five years old. The center has a maximum capacity of 30 children and operatesMondays through Fridays from 6 AM to 6 PM….

Kathleen Wills

941 Highway 142, Poplar Bluff, MO 63901

Costimate: $100/day

Description:

Kathleen Wills in Poplar Bluff, Missouri seeks to provide a nurturing, high quality, safe and fun learning environment that is fit for the child’s overall growth and development. It is a Child Care providerthat can accommodate a certain number of children….

Description:

Charm Southern Learning Center provides a caring and flexible educational program emphasizing a child-centered approach. The educational philosophy is to educate the whole person and promote personalresponsibility and accountability. The unique and robust curriculum integrates traditional academic subjects with music, theater, art and outdoor education. …

Showing 1 – 11 of 11

FAQs for finding daycares in Poplar Bluff

In 2022 what type of daycare can I find near me in Poplar Bluff, MO?

There are a variety of daycares in Poplar Bluff, MO providing full time and part-time care. Some daycares are facility-based and some are in-home daycares operated out of a person’s home. They can also vary in the degree of education and curriculum they offer. Additionally, some daycares offer bilingual programs for parents that want to immerse their children in multiple languages.

How can I find a daycare near me in Poplar Bluff, MO?

If you are looking for daycare options near you, start several months in advance of when you need care for your child. Care.com has 7 in Poplar Bluff, MO as of November 2022 and you can filter daycares by distance from Poplar Bluff or your zip code. From there, you can then compare daycare rates, parent reviews, view their specific services, see their hours of operation and contact them through the website for further information or to request an appointment.

What questions should I ask a daycare provider before signing up?

As you visit daycare facilities in Poplar Bluff, MO, you should ask the providers what their hours are so you can be prepared to adjust your schedule for drop-off and pick-up. Ask what items you are responsible for bringing for your child and what items you may be required to provide that will be shared among other children or the daycare staff. Also, make sure to check directly with the business for information about their local licensing and credentials in Poplar Bluff, MO.

Child Care Centers and Preschools in Poplar Bluff MO

Child development centers in Poplar Bluff vary in size as well as in scope. While some offer progressive curriculums and the latest advancements for preschools, others are more intimate daycare centers that take a more relaxed approach to childcare.
Whatever your priorities, finding the right daycare center for your child is important. We’ve made the seemingly overwhelming task easier by collecting basic information such as size, location, and licensing information for child development centers in Poplar Bluff into a single location.
Simply click on the links below to learn more about Poplar Bluff childcare centers that are dedicated to providing families with safe, quality childcare.
You can also read reviews about various childcare providers to learn more about which is the right choice for your family. We always welcome comments and corrections, to better the browsing experience on our site.

You may also want to check out 10 family child care providers and group home daycare in Poplar Bluff Home Daycare.

SOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY

Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | (573) 785-2372

Head Start is the largest early childhood and family education program in the country and is the nation’s leading investment in early childhood care and education. Head Start provides comprehensive education, health, nutrition, parent involvement, an …

SOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY

Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | (573) 778-0083

Head Start is the largest early childhood and family education program in the country and is the nation’s leading investment in early childhood care and education. Head Start provides comprehensive education, health, nutrition, parent involvement, an …

CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY CARE CENTER, INC.

Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | (573) 785-7570

CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY CARE CENTER, INC. is a CHILD CARE CENTER in POPLAR BLUFF MO, with a maximum capacity of 99 children. This child care center helps with children in the age range of BIRTH – 14 YEARS. The provider does not participate in a subsidiz …

GOODWILL EXCEL CENTER

Poplar Bluff , MO 63901 | (573) 686-6600

GOODWILL EXCEL CENTER is a School Based Care in POPLAR BLUFF MO. The provider does not participate in a subsidized child care program.

KID’S CORRAL CHILDCARE CENTER

Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | (573) 686-2886

KID’S CORRAL CHILDCARE CENTER is a CHILD CARE CENTER in POPLAR BLUFF MO, with a maximum capacity of 137 children. This child care center helps with children in the age range of BIRTH – 16 YEARS. The provider does not participate in a subsidized chil …

LITTLE HEARTS DAYCARE, LLC

Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | (573) 686-2511

LITTLE HEARTS DAYCARE, LLC is a CHILD CARE CENTER in POPLAR BLUFF MO, with a maximum capacity of 79 children. This child care center helps with children in the age range of BIRTH – 12 YEARS. The provider does not participate in a subsidized child ca …

SOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY

Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | (573) 778-9411

SOUTH CENTRAL MISSOURI COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY is a CHILD CARE CENTER in POPLAR BLUFF MO, with a maximum capacity of 80 children. This child care center helps with children in the age range of 36 MONTHS – 5 YEARS. The provider does not participate i …

SOUTHERN CHARM LEARNING CENTER

Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | (573) 785-6938

SOUTHERN CHARM LEARNING CENTER is a CHILD CARE CENTER in POPLAR BLUFF MO, with a maximum capacity of 45 children. This child care center helps with children in the age range of 6 WEEKS – 12 YEARS. The provider does not participate in a subsidized ch …

THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF POPLAR BLUFF

Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | (573) 776-1690

THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF POPLAR BLUFF is a CHILD CARE CENTER in POPLAR BLUFF MO, with a maximum capacity of 80 children. This child care center helps with children in the age range of 5 YEARS – 7 YEARS. The provider does not participate in a subsi …

AGAPE DAY CARE CENTER AND PRESCHOOL

Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | (573) 785-5466

AGAPE DAY CARE CENTER AND PRESCHOOL is a LICENSE EXEMPT PROGRAM in POPLAR BLUFF MO, with a maximum capacity of 98 children. This child care center helps with children in the age range of BIRTH – 12 YEARS. The provider does not participate in a subsi …

HATTIE’S LITTLE SCHOLARS ACADEMY LLC

Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | (573) 609-2216

HATTIE’S LITTLE SCHOLARS ACADEMY LLC is a CHILD CARE CENTER in POPLAR BLUFF MO, with a maximum capacity of 40 children. This child care center helps with children in the age range of BIRTH – 13 YEARS. The provider does not participate in a subsidize …

UNITY ACADEMY 2

Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | (573) 778-9948

UNITY ACADEMY 2 is a CHILD CARE CENTER in POPLAR BLUFF MO, with a maximum capacity of 48 children. This child care center helps with children in the age range of BIRTH – 12 YEARS. The provider does not participate in a subsidized child care program.

UNITY ACADEMY, LLC

Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 | (573) 840-5082

UNITY ACADEMY, LLC is a CHILD CARE CENTER in POPLAR BLUFF MO, with a maximum capacity of 99 children. This child care center helps with children in the age range of BIRTH – 12 YEARS. The provider does not participate in a subsidized child care program.

Thank you for using ChildCareCenter.us. We are constantly enhancing our website to better service you.
Please check back frequently for more updates. If you have any suggestions, please contact us.
We appreciate your business and feedback very much.

report this ad

Russia’s nuclear bluff.: paus144 — LiveJournal

The warranty period for a nuclear charge in a Russian ballistic missile is 10 years, and then the warhead must be sent to the factory, since plutonium needs to be changed in it. Nuclear weapons are an expensive pleasure, requiring the maintenance of an entire industry for the constant maintenance and replacement of charges. Oleksandr Kuzmuk, Minister of Defense of Ukraine from 1996 to 2001, said in an interview that there were 1,740 nuclear weapons in Ukraine, Kuzmuk – “however, those nuclear weapons expired before 1997 years”. Therefore, the adoption by Ukraine of a nuclear-free status was nothing more than a beautiful gesture. “Both Russia and the United States have not been producing weapons-grade uranium or weapons-grade plutonium for almost 10 years now. Somewhere since 1990, all this has been stopped “(V. I. Rybachenkov, Advisor to the Department for Security and Disarmament Affairs of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation). As for the United States, the adviser “misleads the public”, but the fact that under Gorbachev in the USSR was completely curtailed production of weapons-grade uranium and weapons-grade plutonium, that’s just the truth.0003

To avoid the temptation to make new nuclear charges for ballistic missiles, the Americans made a “very profitable” deal (for 20 years!) with the leadership of the Russian Ministry of Atomic Energy. The Americans bought weapons-grade uranium from Russian old warheads (they promised to buy plutonium later), and in return Russian reactors producing weapons-grade plutonium were shut down. “Minatom of Russia: the main milestones in the development of the nuclear industry”: “1994 – Adoption by the Government of the Russian Federation of a decision to stop the production of weapons-grade plutonium”.

In Russia, not only has the service life of old Soviet nuclear warheads for rocket warheads expired “before 1997”, but there is no plutonium to make new ones. They cannot be made from old Soviet plutonium, because, like plutonium in warheads, its isotopic composition has irreversibly changed. And in order to obtain new weapons-grade plutonium and manufacture new nuclear charges for missiles, it takes not just time – there are no specialists, the equipment is not in working condition. In Russia, even the technology for manufacturing barrels for tank guns has been lost; after the first few shots, the flight of the next shells from a new Russian tank is hardly predictable. The reasons are the same – the specialists have grown old or dispersed from non-working industries, and the equipment is either dilapidated or stolen. It is likely that much more sophisticated technologies for obtaining weapons-grade plutonium and creating nuclear charges from it have been lost, and they will have to be restored not for a year or two, but at best for 10 years. And will the Americans allow the Russian Federation to restart reactors to produce highly enriched weapons-grade plutonium? Russia has set up a unique experiment in the destruction of the technosphere of a modern technogenic society, under the current regime, the technosphere is melting before our eyes, society is losing technology, infrastructure, and most importantly, people capable of working not as sellers or security guards. The Russian Federation quite naturally turned from a country with nuclear weapons into a country potentially capable of possessing them, the status has changed from a real superpower to the status of a potential superpower, and this fundamentally changes Russian relations with other countries.

Why was the Russian Federation treated on ceremony until recently, and not slapped at the end of the 90s? After the expiration of the warranty period, nuclear charges are capable of exploding for some time. Let these be not explosions of the power for which they were previously calculated, but if several blocks in New York are demolished and hundreds of thousands of people die, then the American government will have to explain. Therefore, the American government allocated the most powerful supercomputers to the US Department of Energy, officially announcing that for scientists to simulate degradation processes in nuclear charges, the only thing they “forgot” to tell the media was that they were going to simulate degradation processes not in American charges, but in Russian ones. The game was worth the candle and no money was spared for these purposes, the American elite wanted to know for sure – when not a single Russian nuclear warhead was guaranteed to explode. Scientists gave the answer, and when the estimated time approached, American policy towards Russia began to gradually change as fundamentally as the Russian nuclear status.

In the spring of 2006, joint articles by Keir A. Lieber and Daryl G. Press (in Foreign Affairs and International Security) appeared on the possibility of a disarming strike against Russian nuclear forces. Lieber and the Press started an open discussion. In Moscow, only a tiny bunch of kneaded patriots got worried, the elite didn’t move an ear, the American plans coincided with their plans (they weren’t going to leave her a “weapon of retaliation” after setting off from the completely devastated “this country”?). But then the position of the Russian elite “suddenly” became more complicated. At the beginning of 2007, an article was published in the influential newspaper The Washington Post, which recommended no more flirting with the Russian ruling elite, since there is no real power behind it, but to put the crooks in their place. Here the roof was torn off already at Putin himself, and he rolled the “Munich speech” about a multipolar world. And in early 2008, Congress instructed Condoleezza Rice to compile a list of leading Russian corrupt officials. Who in Russia earned big money honestly? Nobody. The last fog has lifted, and the Kremlin elite has a keen sense of the impending end.

Even during the “presidency” of Medvedev, the Russian authorities announced grandiose plans in the military sphere – “Serial construction of warships is planned, primarily nuclear submarines with cruise missiles and multi-purpose submarines. An aerospace defense system will be created.” To which Condoleezza Rice coolly replied in an interview with Reuters – “The balance of power in terms of nuclear deterrence will not change from these actions.” Why would he change? What will Medvedev load onto ships and cruise missiles? There are no suitable nuclear charges. There are only false targets on Russian missiles, there are no real targets. Building a missile defense against missiles like “Satan” is insane, you miss once, and goodbye to a dozen large cities. But against radioactive scrap metal, which today is on Russian missiles instead of warheads (most likely, it was removed, since the old weapons-grade plutonium is very hot – hot as an iron), you can create a missile defense against it, if the missile defense misses, then nothing particularly terrible happens, although it is unpleasant then to decontaminate a hectare of its territory. The missile defense system is designed to catch radioactive scrap metal when the Russian Federation is finally disarmed.

But what about the Russian generals? They fell into mysticism. As once upon the collapse of the Third Reich, and today, with the expected imminent end of the Energy Superpower, the military has the same faith in a secret superweapon, this is the agony of the ability to think soberly. The generals talked about some warheads maneuvering in space (from a technical point of view – complete nonsense), about hypersonic super-high-altitude cruise missiles, about installations that send short super-powerful electromagnetic pulses. Generals love their homeland, but money even more. Enriched uranium was sold at a price 25 times lower than its value, since it was stolen, stolen from its people, and they don’t take the market price for the stolen, but sell it for next to nothing, part of the money for the sale of warheads and sawing the Satan missiles went to the generals. The generals were assigned as batmen in tsarist Russia, they were assigned a chic pension, and in Chechnya you could play to your heart’s content with soldiers, getting drunk to smithereens, sending unfired boys to slaughter, and you won’t get anything for it (at least one general was tried for the storming of Grozny?). The son of every general could also become a general; there are more generals in Russia per capita than anywhere else in the world.

Details about the state of strategic weapons were told in the Duma at closed meetings in order to hide the truth from the population. The media only discussed the state of carriers of nuclear weapons, and kept silent about the main thing, the state of the nuclear weapons themselves. Lying was beneficial to the Americans, as it allowed them to continue waving a picture of a dangerous Russian bear in front of their own electorate. The lies suited the oligarchs, since they were going to leave “this country” in the near future. And the generals are silent, because what can they say now? That they stole a nuclear shield from the people, sawed it up and sold it to the enemy?

For 30 years, the balance of nuclear deterrence has been determined by treaties between the USSR and the US, and the US no longer proposes to start a new treaty process, there is nothing to agree on. Putin ran urgently to legalize the border with China, and China began to publish textbooks, where almost all of Siberia and the Far East are territories taken away by Russia from China. The EU offered Russia to sign the Energy Charter, according to which the EU will extract oil and gas on the territory of the Russian Federation, transport them to itself, and the Russians are offered a reward – fico. EU officials frankly explained that Russia has three options – to lie under the EU, lie under the US or become Chinese cheap labor, that’s the whole choice. The main players are aware of what is happening and are not shy.

After Russia turned from a real superpower into a potential one, the situation around the bank accounts of the Russian elite began to heat up sharply. The UN has adopted a convention on corruption, and the West is not joking today, it is going to use it against our kleptocracy. So the West decided to repay our traitors for their betrayal. Throw throwing – is it a crime, is it immoral? Not at all.

The conversation between the Russian rulers and the West turned into “don’t understand yours”, both sides are talking about completely different things, Moscow tells them – “You promised us!”, and those Russians – “So you have nothing else but a cheap bluff! ” (The sending of the Russian Federation to Venezuela Tu-160 did not cause a new Caribbean crisis, as it was perceived by the “probable adversary” solely as a clownery).

Russia’s richest natural resources cannot belong to a weak, deserted power. The United States decided to stop buying old weapons-grade uranium from the Russian Federation. Although it is very profitable for the Americans to buy it at a price many times lower than its market value, it is more important to land Russian generals.

Meanwhile, Russia has stopped producing weapons-grade plutonium. NTV reported how the last reactor of this type in existence in Russia was shut down in Zheleznogorsk. It has been producing plutonium for the last half century. Especially for its service in the USSR, the closed city of Krasnoyarsk-26 was created, later renamed Zheleznogorsk.

Zheleznogorsk Mining and Chemical Combine was a unique nuclear enterprise with no analogues in the world. Its production shops were located deep underground.

But even if Russia’s nuclear shield by some miracle had survived and the production of nuclear plutonium had not been curtailed, in technical terms the Russian Federation would still be hopelessly behind its closest competitors. For example, the American nuclear potential has long surpassed the Russian nuclear fake by a third. According to Gazeta.Ru, the United States outnumbers Russia by a third in terms of the number of deployed long-range ballistic missiles, their launchers and nuclear warheads.

Russia’s nuclear potential turned out to be below the level of the Treaty on the Reduction of Offensive Arms, which entered into force in February 2011. Experts doubt that the Russian Federation will be able to bring its potential under this ceiling over the next 10 years.

By 2015, Russia could theoretically be slammed like a fly. According to the St. Petersburg Military Parity, maintaining the fleet of Russia’s strategic nuclear triad – ICBMs, strategic submarine missile carriers and heavy bombers – in the required quantitative and qualitative condition will become an impossible task for the country in the foreseeable future. A number of conceptual mistakes in the development of the strategic arsenal, made in the late Soviet and post-Soviet period, led to the fact that after a certain period of time Russia risks being left with a weapon that cannot guarantee the country’s security.

The mobility of strategic weapons as a panacea for their invulnerability played a bad joke on the General Staff of the USSR Armed Forces. First of all, the very concept of creating ICBMs on self-propelled automobile and railway chassis was erroneous. Creating such complex weapons systems as mobile ground-based missile systems (PGRK) RT-2PM “Topol” (NATO code SS-25) and military railway missile systems (BZHRK) RS-22 “Molodets” (SS-24), the country incurred huge additional costs to create these strategic groupings. American ICBMs of the Minuteman and MX series, similar in their combat capabilities, were placed in highly protected silo launchers, where they were in a state of immediate use in an emergency.

What will Russia be left with by 2015? As you know, the BZHRK RS-22 has already been withdrawn from the Strategic Missile Forces and destroyed. A certain number of RS-20 (R-36MUTTKh) and RS-19 (UR-100NUTTKh, NATO code SS-19) mine ICBMs are in service, but their life cycle is already running out. These missiles have not been produced for a long time, and the endless “extensions” of their presence in the Strategic Missile Forces can only cause a bitter smile. The only real combat system is Topol and Topol-M.

In 1994-2002, the number of ICBMs of this type was maintained at the level of 360 launchers. And then, of course, the collapse began. Launchers and missiles were aging, they had to be withdrawn from the combat strength of the Strategic Missile Forces. The deployment of stationary and mobile Topol-M missiles to replace them was catastrophically late. Thus, by 2006, only 252 Topol ICBM launchers remained in service from the highest number of 369from 1993. In return, by 2006, only 42 stationary and the first three mobile Topol-Ms entered service with the Strategic Missile Forces. 117 decommissioned, 45 received. In 2007, according to Military Parity estimates, approximately 225 Soviet-made Topols remained in service, and at the beginning of 2008, according to the website www. russianforces.org, there were only 213 of them units.

According to the calculations of American experts, the entire fleet of mobile Topols should be decommissioned in the next five to seven years. 1984-1993 years of deployment. And what in return? By 2015, Russia plans to adopt 120 Topol-M ICBMs, including 69 in the mobile version. Again, the Russian Federation remains in the red – more than 100 old missiles will not be replaced by anything.

Thus, approximately by 2015, the Russian Strategic Missile Forces will have approximately 76 fixed and 69 mobile Topol-Ms. In total, there will be approximately 145 of them. Note – monoblock. As for the new multiply charged type RS-24, there is no data on their deployment. It is worth noting that the planned deployment of such a number of Topol-M is based on the figures of the State Armaments Program (SAP) until 2015, which has never been fully implemented. The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation cannot in any way fix the cost of certain types of weapons, including strategic ones, as a result of which the defense industry inflates their cost to sky-high heights. The Chief of the General Staff, General Yu. Baluyevsky, spoke about this in an interview with the Vesti-24 channel. And the reason for this is the fact that the Russian defense budget is a completely non-transparent item of public spending, which leads to this kind of financial somersaults.

Let’s recap. By 2015, Russia will have 145 ICBMs in service, of which almost half will be mobile. This is a completely unnecessary waste of resources. The monopolist in the development of strategic missiles, the Moscow Institute of Thermal Engineering, is still holding the Russian Federation hostage to an absolutely outdated “mobility concept”. Even the Americans advise the Chinese not to follow the “Soviet” path, quite clearly understanding the futility of such a decision. And it is felt that overseas experts are not joking, but are advising business. At one time, they were smart enough to abandon the mobile MX and the Midgetmen. And the Russians persist. If you read military forums, then the rocket men themselves call the Topols “matches” for their low combat capabilities, and their mobility even gave rise to a joke: “Why are Topols mobile? “And therefore, to increase the flight range. ”

As is known, the US has adopted a program to modernize the B-2 stealth strategic bombers, as a result of which the Americans will be equipped with the latest radar with active phased array, which has fantastic capabilities for detecting small mobile ground targets, and will be able to take on board up to 80 guided bombs with GPS guidance system. That is, in one sortie, the “invisible” will be able to destroy up to several dozen mobile targets, along the combat route of which destroyed missile launchers, radars and aircraft hangars will lie in ruins. Truly, a saying in a slightly modified form would be appropriate here – “How Mamai flew by.”

The situation with the naval component of the strategic triad is even worse. At present, according to the same overseas site, the Russian Navy has 12 strategic nuclear missile carriers – six type 667BDRM (Delta-IV) and six type 667BDR (Delta-III). They have 162 missiles with 606 nuclear warheads. Seems like a good arsenal. But this is only at first glance. Submarines can be destroyed from air and space in an instant. By 2015, the state of the naval component of the strategic nuclear forces of Russia also raises many questions.

But what about military aviation? This is where things get really bad. Worse than in the Strategic Missile Forces, and even worse than in the SSBN. According to Western estimates, at the beginning of 2008, the Long-Range Aviation of the Russian Air Force had 78 heavy bombers, including 14 Tu-160 (Blacjack) and 64 Tu-95MS (Bear-H), which theoretically can launch 872 long-range cruise missiles into the air.

This type of Russian strategic triad is suitable only for demonstration flights over the oceans. It is absolutely unsuitable for combat response to a surprise attack. All bombers will be destroyed in the blink of an eye by the latest means of aerospace attack. When the flights of strategic bombers were resumed, the American press and even the official representative of the White House openly mocked the prehistoric appearance of the Russian Tu-95MS, counting them as absolute “naphthalene”, taken out from nowhere. Indeed, in our time, keeping a turboprop bomber in service, the engine blades of which have an effective dispersion area (ESR) the size of a football field, is nonsense. Tu-95 has no chance to overcome the airspace of even a third-rate country.

As for the Tu-160, the gigantic dimensions of this aircraft make each of its flights something like the launch of the American Space Shuttle. It is no coincidence that almost every aircraft of this type has its honorary name as a combat ship of the navy. A bomber weighing 275 tons takes on board 150 tons of fuel. Preparation of the aircraft for flight, refueling and suspension of weapons takes several hours, and during this process a swarm of special maintenance vehicles stand near the aircraft. Of course, at X hour, these planes will be easy targets.

What does Russia have as a result?

Sad, frankly speaking, conclusions for imperial hopes.

The group of stationary and mobile Topol-M, which in 2015 will form the almost monopoly backbone of the Strategic Missile Forces, in terms of their combat capabilities will practically remain at the level of light ICBMs of the mid-70s of the last century. Insufficient throw weight of 1-1.5 tons will not allow the implementation of powerful combat equipment of these missiles, including multiply charged warheads for individual targeting. Of course, in theory it is possible to put three low-yield 200 kt nuclear warheads, but even this solution can reduce the range of an ICBM, which today barely reaches 10,000 km.

Equipping these ICBMs with some kind of hypersonic maneuvering warheads that “can overcome any missile defense system” will make the Americans think that Russia views the US as its main adversary. Against this background, the Chinese, with their much larger strategic programs, will appear to the Pentagon hawks as true friends of America. However, the cunning Chinese are trying to achieve this without advertising, unlike Russia, their weapons programs. The Kremlinites are trying to rattle weapons that are not even available. Silly strategy. And funny.

The ideology of deploying the marine component of the triad has been destroyed. SSBNs, which in terms of their total geometric dimensions and displacement are practically not inferior to the American Ohio, will be equipped with small missiles with the formidable name Bulava. The insufficient range of these missiles forces them to be based in the Pacific Fleet right next to the United States. It is no secret that a powerful multi-level missile defense system is being deployed in this region, including a ship-based one with Standard SM-3 anti-missiles, and not only American, but with the inclusion of Japanese and South Korean ships equipped with the AEGIS combat information and control system and vertical missile launchers . Add to this component the GBI anti-missile base in Alaska with offshore platforms of multifunctional SBX missile defense radars floating off its coast. These weapon systems can click like nuts from the first hit of a Bulava missile. And in this area, which is also teeming with anti-submarine defense systems, the Russian “Boreas” with “Maces” will go to swim. Needless to say, a “wise” decision.

Nothing to add about strategic aviation.

As you can see, the systemic crisis of Putin’s vertical put an end to our Russian Federation – the defense industry and the nuclear shield. The “nuclear sword” has turned into a fake, which can only scare Georgia or Chechen militants. However, it is not a fact that even these small nations will tremble in front of a pile of Russian scrap metal inherited by Russia from the militaristic Soviet Union.

Despite the consoling statements of the Russian military leadership, there is simply nothing to defend against the NATO forces of the Russian Federation. The date when the Americans will create a full-scale missile defense system is already known, we are talking about 2015.
The US military cruisers Lake Erie are equipped with the Aegis missile defense system, this missile defense system is capable of tracking and destroying not only intercontinental ballistic missiles, but also nuclear submarines and even orbiting satellites moving at a speed of 8 kilometers per second. This super-weapon will block the Russian imaginary and practically rusty nuclear potential by 100%.
The Aegis anti-missile system was developed on the basis of a conventional air defense system of the same name. American designers simply increased the power of the electromagnetic radiation of the radar and upgraded it for new software. And due to this, the radar system of the Aegis complex was able to track intercontinental ballistic missiles at a great distance – 320 km.
The main armament of the Aegis system is a super-powerful Standard-3 missile of the latest generation, it is capable of destroying targets in outer space and at a distance of up to 500 km.
In order for the Standard-3 to be able to hit targets outside the atmosphere, the developers equipped its body with four stages or blocks with fuel liquid. The first two blocks of the rocket accelerate it within the atmosphere, the third takes the rocket into outer space, and the fourth part of the rocket is a kinetic projectile, it is he who hits the target.
American destroyers with the latest Aegis missile defense system are located not only in the Atlantic Ocean, they periodically enter the Black and Barents Seas. This means one thing – each of them can shoot down a ballistic missile of a Russian nuclear submarine right at the initial stage of the flight, even if the launch is made from Russian territorial waters. This is despite the fact that 40% of Russia’s nuclear potential is based precisely on nuclear submarines.
The Aegis complex can disable Russian missiles already at the acceleration stage, perhaps this is the reason for the refusal of the Americans from any negotiations on missile defense. That is, the Pentagon has become confident that the United States now has such power and such potential that it is able to prevent a nuclear strike from Russia.
By 2015, NATO forces will have 400 cruisers and destroyers equipped with Aegis interceptors and Standard-3 anti-missiles, each of these anti-missiles capable of destroying any Russian intercontinental ballistic missile. And this despite the fact that Russia has only about 80 new intercontinental missiles left, the rest were fired back in the Soviet Union.
The Satan and Topol missiles, which are on duty in the Russian missile forces, are already 30 years old. The combustible mixture with which they are stuffed during this time has lost its qualities, and the metal body of the missiles has corroded, which means that in the event of a military conflict, many of them simply will not take off. And it will be better than they take off, but due to their unpredictability, they will strike at their own territory
In an old Soviet joke, children show off who has what toys. Vanya told about the teddy bear, Tanya boasts of a new Barbie doll, and the drunk son, listening to them with envy, suddenly burst into a tirade:

That’s exactly how Putin’s kneeling electorate is leading today. The nanoleader has nothing more to offer society, the President of the Russian Federation cannot explain to the Russians why he pays tribute to Kadyrov, and the terrorist attacks in the Caucasus do not subside, why his Skolkovo project failed, why the Russians screwed up with the Superjet-100 project, and many others. other Siberian Cranes and Aladdin’s amphoras are not impressive for the plebs. Victory with Colorado scarves is also fizzling out and some kind of whip is required. And here, such happiness – Crimea!

Oleg Leusenko
http://youtu.be/lXV6mNHY7cs
http://ehorussia.com/new/node/9061

Bluff or reality? : starcom68 – LiveJournal

?

Category:

  • Army
  • Cancel

By the way, I don’t know what statements were made by the leaders of the USSR, in addition to statements about sausages, but lately I have been analyzing the defenses of the 12 Main Directorate of the Ministry of Defense and the Strategic Missile Forces of the Cold War era, I have come to a very unexpected conclusion. These structures did not provide in the 60s (for this chronological period I have not yet come out) elementary protection of the objects of the 12th Main Directorate and the Strategic Missile Forces from a sudden nuclear strike from the enemy. But they were sufficient to protect against non-nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction. Given at that time some problems in the USSR with carriers and the number of nuclear warheads + the US military doctrine of retaliatory retaliation, it can be fully assumed that the military Soviet doctrine provided for a preventive nuclear strike against the United States and its allies. Moreover, the American doctrine of retaliation was gradually transformed in the 90s into the doctrine of nuclear deterrence by returning to the monobloc parts of ballistic missiles. In our media, the topic is actively promoted (nothing but to reassure the public) of arming multiple warheads with homing systems capable of “at hypersonic speed and maneuvering in height and direction” to overcome missile defense . ..
************************************
Original taken from vikond65 Bluff or reality ?

Since the start of full-fledged functioning of the US missile defense, Russia reserves the right to take, if necessary, a number of adequate measures, up to a preventive nuclear strike .

This is stated in the Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation approved today by President Vladimir Putin.
Source .

That’s it, no more, no less. Is it really all that serious, and the history of earthly civilization is coming close to its finale? Since the beginning of the nuclear confrontation between the USSR and the USA, such statements have never been made on our part. And this, frankly, is very disturbing.

PS. And the passengers of the Titanic, meanwhile, are arguing heatedly about the Panfilovites and the Kolchak boards.
**************************************** ******** ********
PS: I also do not know what is written in the voiced doctrine on that issue, and not in the journalists’ rehashes. Search scrap. Opinions vary. Can anyone find it? Source here: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201612010045?index=0&rangeSize=1

Tags: State, WMD, Putin, Strategic Missile Forces

Subscribe

  • What did we find with the girl in the abandoned Building 2 of the PPD BZHRK 52nd RD?

    To the Day of the Strategic Missile Forces! Let’s continue our October excursion around the Point of Permanent Deployment of Combat Railroad Missile Systems (PPD BZHRK) of the 52nd missile…

  • PPD BZHRK 52 RD. Farewell to facility No. 1

    On the eve of the Day of the Strategic Missile Forces (RVSN), we will again go on an excursion to the 52nd Missile Division, whose facilities are scattered …

  • RTB of the 52nd Missile Division. The first acquaintance with the most secret part of the connection

    Today, when all progressive mankind celebrates the Day of the Nuclear Support Specialist or the Day of the 12th Main Directorate of the RF Ministry of Defense, we are with you .