Charter schools in houston: Uh oh. We’re very sorry.
Top 10 Best Houston, TX Public Charter Schools (2023)
School (Math and Reading Proficiency)
Location
Grades
Students
Rank: #11.
Cornerstone Academy
Charter School
Math: 81% | Reading: 75%
Rank:
Top 5%
Add to Compare
9016 Westview Dr
Houston, TX 77055
(713) 251-1609
Grades: 6-8
| 361 students
Rank: #22.
Houston Gateway Academy – Coral Campus
Charter School
Math: 67% | Reading: 71%
Rank:
Top 5%
Add to Compare
1020 Coral St
Houston, TX 77012
(713) 923-5060
Grades: PK-12
| 923 students
Rank: #33.
Houston Gateway Academy Inc Elite College Prep
Charter School
Math: 65% | Reading: 65%
Rank:
Top 10%
Add to Compare
7310 Bowie
Houston, TX 77087
(713) 644-8292
Grades: PK-8
| 663 students
Rank: #44.
Houston Gateway Academy
Charter School
Math: 66% | Reading: 60%
Rank:
Top 10%
Add to Compare
3400 Evergreen Dr
Houston, TX 77087
(713) 649-2706
Grades: PK-8
| 648 students
Rank: #55.
Harmony School Of Excellence – Sugar Land
Charter School
Math: 61% | Reading: 62%
Rank:
Top 10%
Add to Compare
1428 Eldridge Rd
Houston, TX 77099
(281) 302-6445
Grades: 6-8
| 655 students
Rank: #66.
Harmony School Of Innovation-sugar Land
Charter School
Math: 45-49% | Reading: 75-79%
Rank:
Top 20%
Add to Compare
13522 W Airport Blvd
Houston, TX 77099
(281) 302-6445
Grades: 9-12
| 710 students
Rank: #77.
Amigos Por Vida-friends For Life Charter School
Charter School
Math: 65% | Reading: 52%
Rank:
Top 20%
Add to Compare
5500 El Camino Del Rey
Houston, TX 77081
(713) 349-9945
Grades: PK-8
| 502 students
Rank: #88.
Harmony Science Academy – Cedar Park
Charter School
Math: 55-59% | Reading: 50-54%
Rank:
Top 20%
Add to Compare
12200 Anderson Mill Rd
Houston, TX 77099
(512) 284-9880
Grades: PK-5
| 673 students
Rank: #99.
Westchester Academy For International Studies
Charter School
Math: 49% | Reading: 62%
Rank:
Top 20%
Add to Compare
901 Yorkchester
Houston, TX 77079
(713) 251-1800
Grades: 6-12
| 924 students
Rank: #1010.
The Rhodes School – Nw
Charter School
Math: <50% | Reading: <50%
Rank:
Top 30%
Add to Compare
13334 Wallisville Rd Buildings
Houston, TX 77049
(281) 459-9797
Grades: K-5
| 102 students
Rank: #1111.
Harmony School Of Advancement-houston
Charter School
Math: 35-39% | Reading: 65%
Rank:
Top 30%
Add to Compare
3171 N Sam Houston Pkwy W
Houston, TX 77038
(281) 741-8899
Grades: 9-12
| 708 students
Rank: #1212.
Univ Of Houston Charter Sch-tech
Charter School
Math: 40-59% | Reading: 40-59%
Rank:
Top 30%
Add to Compare
3855 Holman St Melcher Gym 100
Houston, TX 77204
(713) 743-9111
Grades: 1-5
| 86 students
Rank: #1313.
Kipp Sharpstown Colege Prep
Charter School
Math: 43% | Reading: 52%
Rank:
Top 30%
Add to Compare
8440 Westpark Dr
Houston, TX 77063
(281) 879-3005
Grades: 5-8
| 465 students
Rank: #14 – 1614. – 16.
Alief Montessori Community School
Charter School
Math: 40-44% | Reading: 50-54%
Rank:
Top 30%
Add to Compare
12013 6th St
Houston, TX 77072
(281) 530-9406
Grades: PK-8
| 331 students
Rank: #14 – 1614. – 16.
Kipp Houston High School
Charter School
Math: 40-44% | Reading: 52%
Rank:
Top 30%
Add to Compare
10711 Kipp Way St
Houston, TX 77099
(832) 328-1051
Grades: 9-12
| 692 students
Rank: #14 – 1614. – 16.
Kipp Unity Primary
Charter School
Math: 40-44% | Reading: 50-54%
Rank:
Top 30%
Add to Compare
8500 Hwy 6 S
Houston, TX 77083
(832) 230-0572
Grades: PK-4
| 892 students
Rank: #1717.
Texas Connections Academy At Houston
Charter School
Math: 35% | Reading: 63%
Rank:
Top 30%
Add to Compare
10550 Richmond Ave Houston Tx
Houston, TX 77042
(281) 661-8293
Grades: 3-12
| 8,022 students
Rank: #1818.
Harmony School Of Discovery – Houston
Charter School
Math: 43% | Reading: 48%
Rank:
Top 30%
Add to Compare
6270 Barker Cypress Rd
Houston, TX 77084
(281) 861-5105
Grades: 6-12
| 835 students
Rank: #1919.
Harmony School Of Innovation – Dallas
Charter School
Math: 35-39% | Reading: 50-54%
Rank:
Top 30%
Add to Compare
8080 W President George Bush H
Houston, TX 77099
(214) 321-0100
Grades: 6-12
| 425 students
Rank: #2020.
Harmony School Of Excellence-houston
Charter School
Math: 43% | Reading: 47%
Rank:
Top 30%
Add to Compare
7340 N Gessner Dr
Houston, TX 77040
(713) 983-8668
Grades: K-8
| 873 students
Rank: #2121.
Harmony Science Academy – Carrollton
Charter School
Math: 40% | Reading: 49%
Rank:
Top 50%
Add to Compare
1024 W Rosemeade Pkwy
Houston, TX 77099
(972) 892-5556
Grades: 6-12
| 579 students
Rank: #2222.
Kipp Academy Middle School
Charter School
Math: 36% | Reading: 52%
Rank:
Top 50%
Add to Compare
10711 Kipp Way St
Houston, TX 77099
(832) 328-1051
Grades: 5-8
| 446 students
Rank: #2323.
Harmony Science Academy-houston Elementary School
Charter School
Math: 35-39% | Reading: 50%
Rank:
Top 50%
Add to Compare
9431 W Sam Houston Pkwy S
Houston, TX 77099
(713) 492-0214
Grades: 9-12
| 694 students
Rank: #2424.
Kipp Sharp Prep
Charter School
Math: 42% | Reading: 45%
Rank:
Top 50%
Add to Compare
8430 Westglen
Houston, TX 77063
(281) 879-3000
Grades: PK-4
| 911 students
Rank: #2525.
Harmony School Of Innovation – Garland
Charter School
Math: 31% | Reading: 59%
Rank:
Top 50%
Add to Compare
2302 Firewheel Pkwy
Houston, TX 77099
(469) 814-0059
Grades: 7-12
| 643 students
Rank: #2626.
Kipp East End High School
Charter School
Math: 21-39% | Reading: 55-59%
Rank:
Top 50%
Add to Compare
5402 Lawndale St
Houston, TX 77023
(281) 879-3100
Grades: 9
| 166 students
Rank: #2727.
Harmony School Of Achievement – Houston
Charter School
Math: 39% | Reading: 44%
Rank:
Top 50%
Add to Compare
16209 Keith Harrow Blvd
Houston, TX 77084
(281) 855-2500
Grades: K-5
| 658 students
Rank: #2828.
Kipp Shine Prep
Charter School
Math: 38% | Reading: 44%
Rank:
Top 50%
Add to Compare
10711 Kipp Way
Houston, TX 77099
(832) 230-0548
Grades: PK-4
| 874 students
Rank: #2929.
Harmony School Of Innovation – Fort Worth
Charter School
Math: 33% | Reading: 49%
Rank:
Top 50%
Add to Compare
8100 S Hulen St
Houston, TX 77099
(817) 386-5505
Grades: 6-12
| 961 students
Rank: #30 – 3130.
– 31.
Kipp Connect Houston Primary
Charter School
Math: 37% | Reading: 44%
Rank:
Top 50%
Add to Compare
6700 Bellaire Blvd
Houston, TX 77074
(281) 879-3023
Grades: PK-4
| 901 students
Rank: #30 – 3130. – 31.
Yes Prep – Southeast
Charter School
Math: 37% | Reading: 44%
Rank:
Top 50%
Add to Compare
353 Crenshaw Rd
Houston, TX 77034
(713) 967-9400
Grades: 6-12
| 986 students
Rank: #3232.
Yes Prep – North Central
Charter School
Math: 42% | Reading: 40%
Rank:
Top 50%
Add to Compare
13703 Aldine Westfield Rd
Houston, TX 77039
(713) 967-8800
Grades: 6-12
| 987 students
Rank: #3333.
Harmony School Of Innovation – Houston
Charter School
Math: 36% | Reading: 45%
Rank:
Top 50%
Add to Compare
9421 W Sam Houston Pkwy S
Houston, TX 77099
(713) 541-3030
Grades: 6-8
| 536 students
Rank: #3434.
Step Charter Elementary School
Charter School
Math: 30-34% | Reading: 45-49%
Rank:
Top 50%
Add to Compare
11250 S Wilcrest Dr
Houston, TX 77099
(281) 988-7797
Grades: K-8
| 277 students
Rank: #3535.
Yes Prep – Southwest
Charter School
Math: 38% | Reading: 37%
Rank:
Top 50%
Add to Compare
4411 Anderson Rd
Houston, TX 77053
(713) 967-9200
Grades: 6-12
| 1,030 students
Show 100 more public schools in Houston, TX (out of 163 total schools)
Loading…
KIPP Texas-Houston – KIPP Texas Public Schools
Skip to main navigation
Skip to content
View Schools in this Region
KIPP Texas-Houston has 32 tuition-free schools educating close to 23,400 students from educationally underserved communities and is part of the KIPP Texas network of more than 57 pre-K-12 schools with 35,000 students across Austin, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, and San Antonio.
Why KIPP Texas-Houston
Together with our families and communities, KIPP Texas-Houston creates joyful, academically excellent schools that prepare our students to pursue any path they choose—college, career, and beyond— so they can lead fulfilling lives and build a more just world.
See Our Schools
2022-2023 KIPP Texas-Houston Academic Calendar
KIPP Texas–Houston Academics
Our success in achieving the mission of creating equitable and joyful schools rests heavily on all members of our instructional team fully embracing four elements of our design: Culture, Alignment, Rigor/Ratio, and Engagement.
Culture
A strong and positive culture is our lifeblood. Creating a rigorous, joyful student culture that drives learning and character development is paramount to our success.
Alignment
We rely on aligned curriculum as an important lever in the Teaching and Learning cycle while also acknowledging that an effective teacher is the highest lever in the cycle.
Rigor/Ratio
We believe that without struggle, there can be no progress. Therefore, we believe that our students should be engaged in rigorous and productive struggle in order to reach the demands of college-readiness.
Engagement
We base our belief about engagement in research-based practices and neuroscience. Research has shown us that deep learning only happens when people are cognitively and emotionally engaged with the material in front of them and when people feel safe in their environment.
Our Primary Schools
Our primary schools are founded on community, care and the cultivation of a love for learning. Our goal is for students to love school from the very start. There is a strong emphasis on Foundational Literacy, Conceptual Math, and exposure to STEAM experiences (science, technology, engineering, arts, and math).
View Primary Schools
Our Middle Schools
Middle school is the place and space to begin the development of our student’s identities as informed and engaged citizens of their school, communities, and of the world.
They learn to think deeply, to write passionately, and to engage thoughtfully with rigorous learning experiences.
View Middle Schools
Our High Schools
High schools are designed to ensure students explore the possibilities beyond high school in a safe environment. They build their intellectual expertise through rigorous coursework and Advanced Placement classes. They feed their thirst for learning and leadership through a broad range of learning experiences whether it is advocacy, class debates, taking action in their communities, bringing us inspiration through the arts, designing new prototypes, compete athletically, and so much more. They graduate ready to choose a path that creates a fulfilling life whether it is college or another viable path.
View High Schools
Mastering the Fundamentals
Our primary responsibility is to provide an instructional program in which students will be given the opportunity to master the fundamental skills of reading, writing, listening, speaking, spelling, and mathematics.
Likewise, other fundamental learnings in the arts, literature, foreign language, natural sciences, social sciences, physical education, and college and career readiness skills must be provided for all student. Recognition must be given to and provisions made for the individual capabilities, creative talents, needs, and interests of each student.
KIPP Texas-Houston Schools
Enroll Your Child
Apply now and learn more about enrolling a student at KIPP Texas Public Schools!
Enroll
Join Our Team
View career opportunities for talented people who work hard to inspire a life-long love of learning.
Apply
Support
Your support ensures that greater numbers of KIPPsters acquire the knowledge and skills they need to thrive.
Donate
American school: what’s around the corner?
Policy
914
Share
In her first week as US Secretary of Education, Betsy DeVos has been busily explaining her new vision for the school system and what her agency’s role might be.
Betsy DeVos
She also had to spend a lot of time and effort fending off numerous critics who, in her own words, made her life “a real hell.” Even in the bowels of the Ministry, DeVos assures, there are a lot of people who want her to fail.
Probably never before in the history of American education has there been such a controversial figure. At the very first public school she visited in the capital, Jefferson Middle School Academy, the road was blocked by pickets of demonstrators. True, then she was given the opportunity to go inside and talk with teachers and children. At another school in San Diego that DeVos wanted to attend, the board voted not to invite her, in other words, they showed her the door. Why is she so repulsed? Is it because they see in her a “person from the outside”, a political figure, a billionaire, anyone, but not a person who is ready to take the problems and troubles of the American school to heart.
So who is she anyway? Indeed, a champion of reforms, from whom one can expect serious changes in the education system? Or a dreamer far from real life, who is in captivity of her good intentions?
It is instructive to read the interviews that Betsy DeVos now willingly gives. In one, excerpted by the online publication Axios last week, she said: “I expect there will be more charter schools. More private schools. There will be more virtual schools. I expect there will be schools of all kinds that have ever been invented.” That is, hopes are pinned on diversity. And instead of a single system of public education regulated by officials from Washington, the freedom to choose locally what is more suitable in each case. But what about the Ministry, which is headed by DeVos? Will there be a need for it? Does she not cut the branch on which she sits? “I am not at all afraid that I will be left without a job,” she admits. – But it’s unlikely to happen. I’m not sure that there will be supporters in Congress for the liquidation of the Ministry.
What then will be its function in the reformed education system? “I think in some cases his role will be to protect the students and create a safe environment for them,” said DeVos. – Well, let’s say there were segregated schools in which girls were not allowed to play the same sports as boys. In such cases, there might be an occasion for the government to intervene.” However, when asked if she could give any more examples, she said that nothing else came to mind yet.
According to DeVos, the possibilities of public schools have been exhausted. The situation they are in now is a dead end. The future belongs to alternative schools: charter, voucher, online, etc. She sees salvation in them, and also in instilling in the classroom “a love for American values and building character” – something that is now completely absent “in our realistic and politically correct world,” as she emphasized in a conversation with conservative columnist Cal Thomas. Here, in fact, is the whole concept.
Nothing more specific, no details. But Betsy DeVos believes her plan will succeed. Opponents strongly doubt this. They remind the leader of public education that she herself has not experienced the charms of this education. She studied at a private school. She also sent four of her children to private schools. He has no practical experience in the field of education.
As for charter schools, they still exist, funded by the state, but run by independent organizations. And there are vouchers. According to 2012 data, the education of one student cost the state an average of $10,615. For this amount, parents were given vouchers and the opportunity to choose an educational institution for their child at their discretion. What new is she going to bring? Close all public schools? Announce “voucherization of the whole country”?
Waiting for change
America was once proud of its achievements in education. But those times are in the past. Are American children ready, when they grow up, to maintain the leadership of the country in a rapidly changing and more complex world? For almost half a century there have been heated discussions on the topic: how to make the American education system competitive again? The participants in these disputes more than once indulged in dreams: if only we could find effective pedagogy, correct teaching methods! In search of a magic “magic wand” various experiments were born: New Math, Whole Language, “open classes”.
Talk about “school reform” has become a commonplace in articles and scholarly writings.
At the same time, the reforms should not be understood as a crushing, revolutionary destruction of the entire structure of the school. So no one asks the question. The word “reform” in relation to education is used in two different senses. One refers to school subjects and teaching methods. For example, the use of computers in classrooms and conceptual math programs. Many professional organizations are engaged in such reforms, for example, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. And there are other reforms. They concern school administration, management methods, personnel and financial policy. This side of the problem is now receiving more and more attention. Experts tend to think that neither class sizes, nor textbooks, nor teaching methods, nor programs, nor technology is as important as the “quality” of the teacher. How is DeVos going to raise it? Nothing has been said about this yet.
From her visit to Jefferson Middle School Academy, she took the following impressions: “I have noticed that the educators are in ‘recipient’ mode. They wait to be told what to do. And this does not give the desired effect in working with the child. There is no doubt that over the past 15 years, the independence of school teachers has been noticeably curtailed. They are required to adhere to top-down curricula and spend a lot of time preparing for standardized tests. But this still does not mean that they just sit and wait until they are told what to do.
Public schools in America have a long history. It started back in the 1820s and 1830s. By the 1840s, the demand for teachers increased dramatically. Mostly women went to school. For men, such work seemed not prestigious. In 1857, the National Education Association (NEA) was formed in Philadelphia. It was the first professional association of teachers. At first, there were only 100 people in its ranks. A century and a half later, the number grew to 3.
2 million. In 1887, the first NEA conference took place. What do you think was the main item on the agenda? The same one that is the stumbling block in today’s discussions – granting teachers the right to work for life, what is called in English lifetime tenure.
Innovators Wanted
If the “quality” of a teacher is paramount, then naturally nothing is more important than being able to hire good teachers and fire bad teachers without any obstacles. But here’s where the snag comes in. So far, getting rid of a weak teacher, from a legal point of view, is very difficult. There is no doubt that in the field of education there are many experienced teachers who are knowledgeable, dedicated to their work, loving children. But the most capable people do not always come to cultivate this “field”. How is the new minister going to change this order?
Much of what DeVos is offering now is not new. Participants of the StudentsFirst movement spoke more than once about charter schools and the need to loosen the grip of the “center” and give more local initiative.
The name conveys a simple idea: the interests of the students should be put at the forefront, whatever is done. Michelle Rea, an educator, head of the school system in the American capital from 2007 to 2010, stood at the origins. This woman knows about the troubles of schools firsthand. In December 2010, while appearing on the popular television program The Oprah Winfrey Show, Michelle Rea announced that she was launching the StudentsFirst movement. To date, there are more than a million members in its ranks.
The organization is headquartered in Sacramento, California. It is assumed that the changes called for by the reformers should be carried out in three directions.
The first is to improve the quality of teaching.
The second is to equip parents with pedagogical knowledge that will allow them to take a more active part in the education and upbringing of schoolchildren.
And finally, the third is to call on politicians across the country to pass legislation that would allow local school systems to function more effectively.
StudentsFirst advocates the concept of choice that should be given to parents. One such alternative is charter schools. Each of them has its own charter, a set of standards and rules that determine all life within their walls. But in any case, they are accountable to their parents in everything related to academic performance, especially with regard to standardized tests. Now in many states, local laws limit the number of charter schools. StudentsFirst is fighting for restrictions to be lifted. The idea of grants from public funds for children from low-income families is also supported so that these children have the opportunity to study in private schools.
So, as you can see, there is no shortage of good ideas. The question is how to make them a reality? Will Betsy DeVos be able to find a practical approach to realizing her reform ideas? With all doubts, it is still worth giving her a chance.
Send your questions by email. mail: [email protected].
Subscribe
Authors:
org/Person”>
Lev Borshevsky
Government of the Russian Federation
USA
Washington
School
Elections
Sport
Children
-
21 July
Gas versus firewood: how blue fuel for Astrakhan residents turns from a dream into reality
-
July 20
The after-gasification program is changing the lives of South Ural residents for the better
-
July 19
Magic blue flame
What else to read
-
The target of the missile attack on the Odessa port point “Bugaz” became known
24425
Olga Bozheva
-
What “Stalin’s gift” Putin told Poland about: 25% of the territory of pre-war Germany
15204
Alexander Dobrovolsky
-
The death of a young Dagestan woman during buttock augmentation revealed an all-Russian problem
Photo
7598
Zhanna Golubitskaya
-
The Ministry of Construction proposed a new system of payment for housing and communal services
10264
Ludmila Alexandrova
-
A claim for 30 million was filed against a Muscovite who infected her husband with HIV
6199
Augustine Severin
What to read:More materials
In the regions
-
British visionaries: APU will enter the Crimea in a month
22783
Crimea
crimea.
mk.ru
photo: MK in Crimea -
Water stopped flowing into the North Crimean Canal
Photo
15675
Crimea
photo: MK in Crimea
-
A fire broke out at the training ground in the Kirovsky district, traffic along Tavrida was blocked
12494
Crimea
photo: MK in Crimea
-
In the Novosibirsk region, residents announced the brutal murder of the chairman of SNT Avtomobilist
11668
Novosibirsk
Daria Melekhova
-
July 18 is the holiday of Sergius of Radonezh, which is strictly prohibited on the day of the heavenly patron of Russia
Photo
11606
Pskov
-
“Jubilee” of Mikhail Klok: the leader of an organized criminal group is brought to trial for the tenth time, he is accused of a particularly serious crime
Photo
6997
Ekaterinburg
Maxim Boykov
mk.ruIn the regions:More materials
in the USA the Soviet education system became fashionable – 03/09/2023 – Articles on REN TV
Photo: © TASS/DPA/Thomas Eisenhuth Read ren.
tv at
The trend towards Soviet education is rapidly gaining popularity in the US. Many Americans believe that this approach to learning is much more effective, which means it will be an indisputable advantage when entering prestigious universities.
More and more parents want their children to learn “Russian mathematics”. This opportunity is offered by the school of Alexander Kolchinsky Russian Math Tutors. In an interview with REN TV , he spoke about the uniqueness of the method and how Americans are taught mathematics according to the Soviet program.
Share
The owner of the school told how Americans are taught according to the methods of the USSR
How the idea to create a Russian school in America came about
Alexander Kolchinsky was born in the USSR and moved to America as a child. According to Alexander, the idea to open his own mathematical school in the States came to him about three years ago.
“We started with homeschooling, which was very popular in the US at the time.
But then COVID broke out, and we had to go online. We looked at several options and settled on the Russian math school. And since we were Russians, we thought that this would suit us perfectly. I have a technical background, I am a software developer. We studied various programs available in Russia, decided to translate them and adapt them for American children”, – he noted.
Photo: © TASS/dpa/Nicolas Armer
The owner of the school proudly admits that the adaptation created by his team was very successful. Today, more than a thousand students have been trained under the Russian Math Tutors program, Kolchinsky said.
“The Russian Mathematics School has a strict and clear program. It is a school with large classes of 12 to 15 students, where group classes are held. And we thought about giving students the opportunity for private tuition one on one. Therefore, we decided to adapt the Russian math school program for private tuition, where students will have a choice.
We have made the program more flexible so that students can schedule lessons themselves or cancel them. But still, this program should was to become much stricter and more powerful than that which is in modern American schools,” – says Alexander.
What is the uniqueness of the Soviet approach to education
Kolchinsky said that in most American schools students study under the “Common Core” program, which was introduced in early 2000 by George W. Bush.
“In another way it’s called ‘No child falling behind’. That’s the idea. Well, if you care that no child falls behind, it means that you are trying to bring up the losers at the expense of the excellent students. And in the USSR, they used more of an elitist approach, where less successful children had to try to keep up with the excellent students. I heard that Aristotle had the same idea. A fast learning child is not looks back at the slower one, right? And this is the principle that, in our opinion, guided in Soviet schools.
We adapted it for our own curriculum, “ – explained the creator of Russian Math Tutors.
“We explain to children why mathematics is needed”
Alexander noted that the main difference between the “Russian approach” is that students are explained why it is important to learn mathematics and how the queen of sciences can be useful to them in everyday life.
“There were two main aspects in the Soviet program, right? There was a development of the individual – the builder of communism, so to speak. But we do not use this, although we teach some ethical norms, such as respect for elders, respect for the teacher. We really try to teach this. And the second aspect is mathematics itself. Our approach differs in that it is focused on logical mathematics. It reflects more problems of the real world, both in science and in everyday life. There is a well-known problem about parallels – how to jump off a moving train. So this is rather something that will be useful in real life.
The student must know why he studies mathematics, how it can be useful to him. Another difference is that we use methods of abstract mathematics, as well as mental arithmetic. In modern American schools, everyone had to calculate on calculators. In the Soviet Union there was no such technology, so everything is done in your head. In this are the main differences”, – said Kolchinsky.
Photo: © TASS/DPA/Thomas Eisenhuth
“Let’s expand”: big plans for the future
Alexander is convinced that one of the main tasks of his school is to teach children to be flexible and quickly adapt to new conditions. According to him, no one knows what the future holds for us, which is why it is so important to give students all the necessary tools.
“As for the future of our school, I think we will continue to study online for now. But we want to have a regular school at some point. Of course, for this we will have to expand – there will be several locations, not just one.